INTRODUCTION: This study compares cyclosporine (CsA) with tacrolimus (Tac) in preventing acute rejection (AR) after steroid withdrawal (SW) 5 days after renal transplantation (Tx). METHODS: The data were collected from 2 prospective sequential studies carried out from February 2002 to May 2006. Forty-nine patients received CsA, 56 patients Tac. Rapamycin (Rapa) was added to both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The studies were homogeneous regarding both clinical procedures and patient demographics. RESULTS: Three years after SW, Tac was more effective than CsA in reducing the risk both of AR (35% vs. 53%; p<0.06) and mainly of relapses (9% vs. 33%; p<0.007). In addition, Tac enabled more patients to go onto a steroid-free regime (88% vs. 65%; p<0.01). No difference arose concerning the timing of AR, graft function, CNI withdrawal, incidence of side effects or patient and graft survival rates. In both groups, rejection after SW was associated with a worse graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Tac was more effective than CsA in preventing AR after early SW, and increased significantly patient probability of maintaining a steroid-free regime. In this setting, Tac and CsA had the same safety profile. However, a follow-up longer than 3 years might be needed to estimate the consequences of the higher rate of AR encountered under CsA therapy.
INTRODUCTION: This study compares cyclosporine (CsA) with tacrolimus (Tac) in preventing acute rejection (AR) after steroid withdrawal (SW) 5 days after renal transplantation (Tx). METHODS: The data were collected from 2 prospective sequential studies carried out from February 2002 to May 2006. Forty-nine patients received CsA, 56 patientsTac. Rapamycin (Rapa) was added to both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The studies were homogeneous regarding both clinical procedures and patient demographics. RESULTS: Three years after SW, Tac was more effective than CsA in reducing the risk both of AR (35% vs. 53%; p<0.06) and mainly of relapses (9% vs. 33%; p<0.007). In addition, Tac enabled more patients to go onto a steroid-free regime (88% vs. 65%; p<0.01). No difference arose concerning the timing of AR, graft function, CNI withdrawal, incidence of side effects or patient and graft survival rates. In both groups, rejection after SW was associated with a worse graft function. CONCLUSIONS:Tac was more effective than CsA in preventing AR after early SW, and increased significantly patient probability of maintaining a steroid-free regime. In this setting, Tac and CsA had the same safety profile. However, a follow-up longer than 3 years might be needed to estimate the consequences of the higher rate of AR encountered under CsA therapy.
Authors: Sarah Leyking; Karin Budich; Kai van Bentum; Stephan Thijssen; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq; Danilo Fliser; Martina Sester; Urban Sester Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 5.531