B Elsberger1, D M Paravasthu, S M Tovey, J Edwards. 1. Institute of Cancer, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, McGregor Building, Dumbarton Road, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Src kinase, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is overexpressed and highly activated in a number of human cancers and appears to show a significant relationship with breast cancer progression. Recent in vitro studies have suggested that Src kinase may be involved in tamoxifen resistance. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed on 392 resected breast cancers using an antibody to c-Src. Expression was assessed using the weighted histoscore method. RESULTS: Forty-five percentage of breast tumours exhibited nuclear, 46% cytoplasmic and 7% membrane expression. Lymph node positivity correlated with cytoplasmic c-Src tumour expression levels (P < 0.001). Nuclear c-Src correlated negatively with cytoplasmic and membrane c-Src expression (P < 0.001, P = 0.005). High expression levels of cytoplasmic c-Src was associated with worse disease-specific survival (P = 0.026) after completing 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. However, high expression of c-Src at any cellular location did not show any association with de novo relapse on tamoxifen (c-Src nuc P = 0.906, c-Src cyto P = 0.735 and c-Src memb P = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS: No translational evidence was found in this study to support a role for Src kinase in developing de novo tamoxifen resistance. However, based on our findings on late clinical outcome, patients with high cytoplasmic c-Src may be selected for continuing endocrine therapy to prevent worsening prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Src kinase, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is overexpressed and highly activated in a number of humancancers and appears to show a significant relationship with breast cancer progression. Recent in vitro studies have suggested that Src kinase may be involved in tamoxifen resistance. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed on 392 resected breast cancers using an antibody to c-Src. Expression was assessed using the weighted histoscore method. RESULTS: Forty-five percentage of breast tumours exhibited nuclear, 46% cytoplasmic and 7% membrane expression. Lymph node positivity correlated with cytoplasmic c-Srctumour expression levels (P < 0.001). Nuclear c-Src correlated negatively with cytoplasmic and membrane c-Src expression (P < 0.001, P = 0.005). High expression levels of cytoplasmic c-Src was associated with worse disease-specific survival (P = 0.026) after completing 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. However, high expression of c-Src at any cellular location did not show any association with de novo relapse on tamoxifen (c-Src nuc P = 0.906, c-Src cyto P = 0.735 and c-Src memb P = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS: No translational evidence was found in this study to support a role for Src kinase in developing de novo tamoxifen resistance. However, based on our findings on late clinical outcome, patients with high cytoplasmic c-Src may be selected for continuing endocrine therapy to prevent worsening prognosis.
Authors: Maricarmen D Planas-Silva; Richard D Bruggeman; Ronald T Grenko; J Stanley Smith Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2006-01-06 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: B S Verbeek; T M Vroom; S S Adriaansen-Slot; A E Ottenhoff-Kalff; J G Geertzema; A Hennipman; G Rijksen Journal: J Pathol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Oleg Tatarov; Thomas J Mitchell; Morag Seywright; Hing Y Leung; Valerie G Brunton; Joanne Edwards Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Liam Morgan; Julia Gee; Sara Pumford; Lynne Farrow; Pauline Finlay; John Robertson; Ian Ellis; Hisaaki Kawakatsu; Robert Nicholson; Stephen Hiscox Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Rachel Schiff; Suleiman A Massarweh; Jiang Shou; Lavina Bharwani; Syed K Mohsin; C Kent Osborne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sarah L Larsen; Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen; Martin Bak; Anne E Lykkesfeldt; Tove Kirkegaard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Petr Lapcik; Anna Pospisilova; Lucia Janacova; Peter Grell; Pavel Fabian; Pavel Bouchal Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Suzanne A Eccles; Eric O Aboagye; Simak Ali; Annie S Anderson; Jo Armes; Fedor Berditchevski; Jeremy P Blaydes; Keith Brennan; Nicola J Brown; Helen E Bryant; Nigel J Bundred; Joy M Burchell; Anna M Campbell; Jason S Carroll; Robert B Clarke; Charlotte E Coles; Gary J R Cook; Angela Cox; Nicola J Curtin; Lodewijk V Dekker; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Stephen W Duffy; Douglas F Easton; Diana M Eccles; Dylan R Edwards; Joanne Edwards; D Evans; Deborah F Fenlon; James M Flanagan; Claire Foster; William M Gallagher; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Julia M W Gee; Andy J Gescher; Vicky Goh; Ashley M Groves; Amanda J Harvey; Michelle Harvie; Bryan T Hennessy; Stephen Hiscox; Ingunn Holen; Sacha J Howell; Anthony Howell; Gill Hubbard; Nick Hulbert-Williams; Myra S Hunter; Bharat Jasani; Louise J Jones; Timothy J Key; Cliona C Kirwan; Anthony Kong; Ian H Kunkler; Simon P Langdon; Martin O Leach; David J Mann; John F Marshall; Lesley Martin; Stewart G Martin; Jennifer E Macdougall; David W Miles; William R Miller; Joanna R Morris; Sue M Moss; Paul Mullan; Rachel Natrajan; James P B O'Connor; Rosemary O'Connor; Carlo Palmieri; Paul D P Pharoah; Emad A Rakha; Elizabeth Reed; Simon P Robinson; Erik Sahai; John M Saxton; Peter Schmid; Matthew J Smalley; Valerie Speirs; Robert Stein; John Stingl; Charles H Streuli; Andrew N J Tutt; Galina Velikova; Rosemary A Walker; Christine J Watson; Kaye J Williams; Leonie S Young; Alastair M Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 6.466