Literature DB >> 22134069

Thoroughness of mediastinal staging in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Michael T Vest1, Lynn Tanoue, Pamela R Soulos, Anthony W Kim, Frank Detterbeck, Daniel Morgensztern, Cary P Gross.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend that patients with clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo histologic confirmation of pathologic lymph nodes. Studies have suggested that invasive mediastinal staging is underutilized, although practice patterns have not been rigorously evaluated.
METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to identify patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 1998 through 2005. Invasive staging and use of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning were assessed using Medicare claims. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with use of invasive staging.
RESULTS: Of 7583 stage IIIA NSCLC patients, 1678 (22%) underwent invasive staging. Patients who received curative intent cancer treatment were more likely to undergo invasive staging than patients who did not receive cancer-specific therapy (30% versus 9.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.78-3.95). The oldest patients (age, 85-94 years) were less likely to receive invasive staging than the youngest (age, 67-69 years; 27.6% versus 11.9%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.61). Sex, marital status, income, and race were not associated with the use of the invasive staging. The use of invasive staging was stable throughout the study period, despite an increase in the use of PET scanning from less than 10% of patients before 2000 to almost 70% in 2005.
CONCLUSION: Nearly 80% of Medicare beneficiaries with stage IIIA NSCLC do not receive guideline adherent mediastinal staging; this failure cannot be entirely explained by patient factors or a reliance on PET imaging. Incentives to encourage use of invasive staging may improve care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22134069      PMCID: PMC3253367          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318236ecbb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  29 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  D A Rogers; A S Elstein; G Bordage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Bronchoscopy training: current fellows' experiences and some concerns for the future.

Authors:  E F Haponik; G B Russell; J F Beamis; E J Britt; P Kvale; P Mathur; A Mehta
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Comparative efficacy of positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose in evaluation of small (<1 cm), intermediate (1 to 3 cm), and large (>3 cm) lymph node lesions.

Authors:  N C Gupta; G M Graeber; H A Bishop
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.

Authors:  W R Webb; C Gatsonis; E A Zerhouni; R T Heelan; G M Glazer; I R Francis; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Bronchogenic carcinoma: utility of CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected lesions.

Authors:  S L Primack; K S Lee; P M Logan; R R Miller; N L Müller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Elderly patients with lung cancer: biases and evidence.

Authors:  Corey J Langer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2002-02

9.  Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling.

Authors:  T C McLoud; P M Bourgouin; R W Greenberg; J P Kosiuk; P A Templeton; J A Shepard; E H Moore; J C Wain; D J Mathisen; H C Grillo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Lynn T Tanoue; Mitchell L Margolis; John Barker; Frank Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variability in invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer: A multicenter regional study.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; Douglas E Wood; Michael S Mulligan; Alexander S Farivar; Michal Hubka; Kimberly E Costas; Bahirathan Krishnadasan; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Surveillance Practice Patterns after Curative Intent Therapy for Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Christopher T Erb; Kevin W Su; Pamela R Soulos; Lynn T Tanoue; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Use of new treatment modalities for non-small cell lung cancer care in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Michael T Vest; Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Roy H Decker; Lynn Tanoue; Gaetane Michaud; Anthony W Kim; Frank Detterbeck; Daniel Morgensztern; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.