Mevlut Celikoglu1, Mehmet Bayram, Metin Nur. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. mevlutcelikoglu@hotmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients with different patterns of third-molar agenesis, comparing them with patients without third-molar agenesis. METHODS: A sample of 374 patients with agenesis of at least 1 third molar was divided into 4 groups according to the third-molar agenesis pattern, and a control group of 98 patients without third-molar agenesis was randomly selected from the patient archives. Panoramic radiographs and cast models were used to determine the associated dental anomalies, such as hypodontia, hyperdontia, impaction, dilaceration, microdontia, ectopic eruption, transposition, and transmigration. The Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to determine the differences in the distribution of the associated dental anomalies among the groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of agenesis of other teeth (11.2%, n = 42) was significantly greater in our study sample (groups 1-4) than in the control group (group 5) (4.1%, n = 4; P <0.05). When we compared the groups according to the various third-molar agenesis patterns, we found that agenesis of other teeth was more common in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars. In addition, the patients with agenesis of 4 third molars exhibited maxillary lateral-incisor microdontia more frequently. Another important finding was a higher prevalence of total dental anomalies in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent tooth agenesis, microdontia of maxillary lateral incisors, and total dental anomalies are more frequently associated with agenesis of 4 third molars than with the presence of third molars.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients with different patterns of third-molar agenesis, comparing them with patients without third-molar agenesis. METHODS: A sample of 374 patients with agenesis of at least 1 third molar was divided into 4 groups according to the third-molar agenesis pattern, and a control group of 98 patients without third-molar agenesis was randomly selected from the patient archives. Panoramic radiographs and cast models were used to determine the associated dental anomalies, such as hypodontia, hyperdontia, impaction, dilaceration, microdontia, ectopic eruption, transposition, and transmigration. The Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to determine the differences in the distribution of the associated dental anomalies among the groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of agenesis of other teeth (11.2%, n = 42) was significantly greater in our study sample (groups 1-4) than in the control group (group 5) (4.1%, n = 4; P <0.05). When we compared the groups according to the various third-molar agenesis patterns, we found that agenesis of other teeth was more common in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars. In addition, the patients with agenesis of 4 third molars exhibited maxillary lateral-incisor microdontia more frequently. Another important finding was a higher prevalence of total dental anomalies in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent tooth agenesis, microdontia of maxillary lateral incisors, and total dental anomalies are more frequently associated with agenesis of 4 third molars than with the presence of third molars.
Authors: Clarissa Christina Avelar Fernandez; Christiane Vasconcellos Cruz Alves Pereira; Ronir Raggio Luiz; Italo M Faraco; Mary L Marazita; Maria Arnaudo; Flavia M de Carvalho; Fernando E Poletta; Juan C Mereb; Eduardo E Castilla; Iêda M Orioli; Marcelo de Castro Costa; Alexandre Rezende Vieira Journal: Arch Oral Biol Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 2.633
Authors: Michael Nemec; Linda Schwarz; Michael H Bertl; Kristina Bertl; André Gahleitner; Philipp Mitteroecker; Erwin Jonke Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 3.606
Authors: Rafael Gómez de Diego; Javier Montero; Nansi López-Valverde; José Ignacio de Nieves; Juan-Carlos Prados-Frutos; Antonio López-Valverde Journal: J Clin Exp Dent Date: 2017-09-01