Literature DB >> 22133009

Interlaboratory comparison of real-time PCR protocols for quantification of general fecal indicator bacteria.

Orin C Shanks1, Mano Sivaganesan, Lindsay Peed, Catherine A Kelty, A Denene Blackwood, Monica R Greene, Rachel T Noble, Rebecca N Bushon, Erin A Stelzer, Julie Kinzelman, Tamara Anan'eva, Christopher Sinigalliano, David Wanless, John Griffith, Yiping Cao, Steve Weisberg, Valarie J Harwood, Christopher Staley, Kevin H Oshima, Manju Varma, Richard A Haugland.   

Abstract

The application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for the rapid identification of fecal bacteria in environmental waters is being considered for use as a national water quality metric in the United States. The transition from research tool to a standardized protocol requires information on the reproducibility and sources of variation associated with qPCR methodology across laboratories. This study examines interlaboratory variability in the measurement of enterococci and Bacteroidales concentrations from standardized, spiked, and environmental sources of DNA using the Entero1a and GenBac3 qPCR methods, respectively. Comparisons are based on data generated from eight different research facilities. Special attention was placed on the influence of the DNA isolation step and effect of simplex and multiplex amplification approaches on interlaboratory variability. Results suggest that a crude lysate is sufficient for DNA isolation unless environmental samples contain substances that can inhibit qPCR amplification. No appreciable difference was observed between simplex and multiplex amplification approaches. Overall, interlaboratory variability levels remained low (<10% coefficient of variation) regardless of qPCR protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133009     DOI: 10.1021/es2031455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  15 in total

1.  Distribution of genetic marker concentrations for fecal indicator bacteria in sewage and animal feces.

Authors:  Catherine A Kelty; Manju Varma; Mano Sivaganesan; Richard A Haugland; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Tools to minimize interlaboratory variability in vitellogenin gene expression monitoring programs.

Authors:  Aaron Jastrow; Denise A Gordon; Kasie M Auger; Elizabeth C Punska; Kathleen F Arcaro; Kristen Keteles; Dana Winkelman; David Lattier; Adam Biales; James M Lazorchak
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Differential decomposition of bacterial and viral fecal indicators in common human pollution types.

Authors:  Pauline Wanjugi; Mano Sivaganesan; Asja Korajkic; Catherine A Kelty; Brian McMinn; Robert Ulrich; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Performance and specificity of the covalently linked immunomagnetic separation-ATP method for rapid detection and enumeration of enterococci in coastal environments.

Authors:  Amity G Zimmer-Faust; Vanessa Thulsiraj; Donna Ferguson; Jennifer A Jay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Critical review of methods for isothermal amplification of nucleic acids for environmental analysis.

Authors:  Dana M Nieuwkerk; Asja Korajkic; Erika L Valdespino; Michael P Herrmann; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Effect of beach management policies on recreational water quality.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kelly; Zhixuan Feng; Maribeth L Gidley; Christopher D Sinigalliano; Naresh Kumar; Allison G Donahue; Adrianus J H M Reniers; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Biotic interactions and sunlight affect persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and microbial source tracking genetic markers in the upper Mississippi river.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Orin C Shanks; Mano Sivaganesan; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Josey Grabuski; Ed Sverko; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Gold Nanoparticle Labeling Based ICP-MS Detection/Measurement of Bacteria, and Their Quantitative Photothermal Destruction.

Authors:  Yunfeng Lin; Ashton T Hamme
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.331

10.  Improved HF183 quantitative real-time PCR assay for characterization of human fecal pollution in ambient surface water samples.

Authors:  Hyatt C Green; Richard A Haugland; Manju Varma; Hana T Millen; Mark A Borchardt; Katharine G Field; William A Walters; R Knight; Mano Sivaganesan; Catherine A Kelty; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.