| Literature DB >> 22132943 |
Kei Aoyama1, Takako Kamio, Tetsuya Ohchi, Masako Nishizawa, Shingo Kameoka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are various methods for detecting sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using a vital dye is a convenient and safe, intraoperatively preparative method to assess lymph node status. However, the disadvantage of the dye method is that the success rate of sentinel lymph node detection depend on the surgeon's skills and preoperative mapping of the sentinel lymph node is not feasible. Currently, a vital dye, radioisotope, or a combination of both is used to detect sentinel nodes. Many surgeons have reported successful results using either method. In this study we have analyzed breast lymphatic drainage pathways using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22132943 PMCID: PMC3269998 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Figure 1Two patterns of lympathic drainage pathways from the breast to the axillary basin were found. (1) One pattern was a subcutaneous lymphatic vessel from the subareolar area running through the anterior surface of the breast into the lymph node in the midaxilla near the intercostals brachial nerve. Patterns of subcutaneous lymphatic drainage pathway from the areola into the axilla: From one to two streams was drained.
Figure 2(2) Another pattern was a lymphatic a lymphatic vessel running directly from the lateral edge of the parenchyma and through the posterior surface of the breast into the lower axilla, and then to the lymph node located at the midaxilla. Several lymphatic drainage pathways from the areolar area were observed. Several streams from the areola joined together before they drained to the axilla.
Figure 3It is possible to see the fluorescent lymph vessels that run from the body surface to the axilla. Figure 3-a: A skin incision is made at the end of fluorescence emission that extends to the axilla, in order to observe the fluorescent lymph vessels embedded in the subcutaneous tissue. The fluorescent lymph nodes at the end of the lymph vessels are identified. Figure 3-b: After skin incision, the subcutaneous lymphatics were more clearly visible by fluorescence. Figure 3-c: The lymphatic channels and nodes that received ICG appeared as shining fluorescent streams and spots in the fluorescence image. The lymph node was dissected along with its surrounding fatty tissue.
Characteristics of patients and tumors
| Age: 57.4 (29-85) | ||
|---|---|---|
| < 2.0 cm | 214(69%) | |
| > 2.1 cm | 98(31%) | |
| Upper inner A | 57 (18%) | |
| Lower inner B | 24 (8%) | |
| Upper outer C | 133 (43%) | |
| Lower outer D | 22 (7%) | |
| Central E | 76 (24%) | |
| Conservation | 95 (30%) | |
| Mastectomy | 217 (70%) | |
Clinicopathological features
| A | Intraductal carcinoma | 47 (15%) |
| Invasive ductal carcinoma | 239 (77%) | |
| B | 13 (4%) | |
| C | 13 (4%) | |
| Positive | 152 (49%) | |
| Negative | 160 (51%) | |
Tumor characteristics
| Hormonal receptor status | ER (+) and PR (+) | 159 (51%) |
|---|---|---|
| ER (+/-)and/or PR(+/-) | 81 (26%) | |
| ER (-) and PR (-) | 72 (23%) | |
| 0 | 168 (54%) | |
| 1+ | 74 (24%) | |
| 2+ | 24 (7%) | |
| 3+ | 46 (15%) | |
| I | 219 (70%) | |
| II | 80 (26%) | |
| III | 13 (4%) | |
ER: Estrogen receptor
PR: Progesterone receptor
HER2: Human epidermal growth receptor 2
Number of lymphatic flows and nodes
| Direction of lymph current | ||
|---|---|---|
| (1) Toward the axilla | ||
| (2) Toward and through the outside of the mammary gland | ||
| Number of lymph currents and proportion (%) | 0 | 2% |
| 1 | 35% | |
| 2 | 46% | |
| 3 | 12% | |
| 4 | 5% | |
| Identification rate: 100% | ||
| Identified lymph nodes (average) | Sentinel lymph nodes | 3.41 (range: 1-12) |
| Level I | 1.66 (range: 0-10) | |
| Total | 5.07 (range: 1-17) | |
Unfavorable events and deaths
| SLNB Group (n = 263) | SLNB- > ALND | |
|---|---|---|
| Unfavorable events | 0 | 0 |
| Events other than death | 0 | 0 |
| Axillary metastasis | 0 | 0 |
| Supraclavicular metastasis | 1 (0.3%) | 0 |
| Recurrence in ipsilateral breast | 18 (0.3%) | 0 |
| Cancer in contralateral breast | 0 | 0 |
| Distant metastasis | 5 (2%) | 4 (8%) |
| Other primary tumor | 0 | 0 |
| Death due to breast cancer | 3 (1%) | 2 (4%) |
| Death from other causes | 0 | 0 |
ALND: Axillary lymph node dissection
SLNB: Sentinel lymph node biopsy
SLNB- > ALND: Because of being positive for lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node biopsy, a total dissection of the axillary lymph nodes was applied.
Statistical significance was evaluated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test. There were no significant differences between the two groups. (P = 0.55)
Benefits and Drawbacks of ICG Flourescence Method
| Benefits of ICG fluorescence method | Drawbacks of ICG fluorescence method |
|---|---|
| (1) The subcutaneous lymphatic vessels running from the areola to the axilla can be observed from outside, through the skin allowing of the accurate determination location of the skin incision in the axilla. | (1) If lymph vessels that have been emitting fluorescence signal are damaged, ICG will leak into the surrounding tissue, preventing an accurate identification of sentinel lymph nodes. |
| (2) Fluorescence can be used as a guide to remove the lymph vessels running toward the axilla more easily. | (2) Many lymph nodes that are emitting fluorescence, with an average of five or more, can appear |
| (3) If any fluorescence signal is detected in the extracted lymph nodes, it means there are sentinel lymph nodes in those lymph nodes. | (3) Skin pigmentation due to ICG remains for a certain period of time. |
| (4) Other benefits include: no exposure to radiation, easy to use, and cost effectiveness. | |