BACKGROUND: Several conceptual models have been considered for the assessment of personality pathology in DSM-5. This study sought to extend our previous findings to compare the long-term predictive validity of three such models: the five-factor model (FFM), the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality (SNAP), and DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs). METHOD: An inception cohort from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorder Study (CLPS) was followed for 10 years. Baseline data were used to predict long-term outcomes, including functioning, Axis I psychopathology, and medication use. RESULTS: Each model was significantly valid, predicting a host of important clinical outcomes. Lower-order elements of the FFM system were not more valid than higher-order factors, and DSM-IV diagnostic categories were less valid than dimensional symptom counts. Approaches that integrate normative traits and personality pathology proved to be most predictive, as the SNAP, a system that integrates normal and pathological traits, generally showed the largest validity coefficients overall, and the DSM-IV PD syndromes and FFM traits tended to provide substantial incremental information relative to one another. CONCLUSIONS: DSM-5 PD assessment should involve an integration of personality traits with characteristic features of PDs.
BACKGROUND: Several conceptual models have been considered for the assessment of personality pathology in DSM-5. This study sought to extend our previous findings to compare the long-term predictive validity of three such models: the five-factor model (FFM), the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality (SNAP), and DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs). METHOD: An inception cohort from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorder Study (CLPS) was followed for 10 years. Baseline data were used to predict long-term outcomes, including functioning, Axis I psychopathology, and medication use. RESULTS: Each model was significantly valid, predicting a host of important clinical outcomes. Lower-order elements of the FFM system were not more valid than higher-order factors, and DSM-IV diagnostic categories were less valid than dimensional symptom counts. Approaches that integrate normative traits and personality pathology proved to be most predictive, as the SNAP, a system that integrates normal and pathological traits, generally showed the largest validity coefficients overall, and the DSM-IV PD syndromes and FFM traits tended to provide substantial incremental information relative to one another. CONCLUSIONS: DSM-5 PD assessment should involve an integration of personality traits with characteristic features of PDs.
Authors: Andrew E Skodol; Lee Anna Clark; Donna S Bender; Robert F Krueger; Leslie C Morey; Roel Verheul; Renato D Alarcon; Carl C Bell; Larry J Siever; John M Oldham Journal: Personal Disord Date: 2011-01
Authors: Andrew E Skodol; John M Oldham; Donna S Bender; Ingrid R Dyck; Robert L Stout; Leslie C Morey; M Tracie Shea; Mary C Zanarini; Charles A Sanislow; Carlos M Grilo; Thomas H McGlashan; John G Gunderson Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: J G Gunderson; M T Shea; A E Skodol; T H McGlashan; L C Morey; R L Stout; M C Zanarini; C M Grilo; J M Oldham; M B Keller Journal: J Pers Disord Date: 2000
Authors: Kasey G Creswell; Tammy Chung; Aidan G C Wright; Duncan B Clark; Jessica J Black; Christopher S Martin Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Fartein Ask Torvik; Eivind Ystrom; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Christopher J Hopwood; Leslie C Morey; M Brent Donnellan; Douglas B Samuel; Carlos M Grilo; Thomas H McGlashan; M Tracie Shea; Mary C Zanarini; John G Gunderson; Andrew E Skodol Journal: J Pers Date: 2013-02-05
Authors: Christopher C Conway; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Eiko I Fried; Michael N Hallquist; Roman Kotov; Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt; Alexander J Shackman; Andrew E Skodol; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Monika A Waszczuk; David H Zald; Mohammad H Afzali; Marina A Bornovalova; Natacha Carragher; Anna R Docherty; Katherine G Jonas; Robert F Krueger; Praveetha Patalay; Aaron L Pincus; Jennifer L Tackett; Ulrich Reininghaus; Irwin D Waldman; Aidan G C Wright; Johannes Zimmermann; Bo Bach; R Michael Bagby; Michael Chmielewski; David C Cicero; Lee Anna Clark; Tim Dalgleish; Colin G DeYoung; Christopher J Hopwood; Masha Y Ivanova; Robert D Latzman; Christopher J Patrick; Camilo J Ruggero; Douglas B Samuel; David Watson; Nicholas R Eaton Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2019-03-07