Literature DB >> 22132747

The relationship between the bladder volume and optimal treatment planning in definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Naoki Nakamura1, Naoto Shikama, Osamu Takahashi, Kenji Sekiguchi, Yukihiro Hama, Keiko Akahane, Keiichi Nakagawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no current consensus regarding the optimal bladder volumes in definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between the bladder volume and optimal treatment planning in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty-three patients underwent definitive radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer. The prescribed dose defined as 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving ≧ 100% of the prescription dose was 76 Gy in 38 fractions. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the prostate with a 5-mm margin and 2 cm of the proximal seminal vesicle. The PTV was defined as the CTV with a 5-mm margin. Treatment plans were optimized to satisfy the dose constraints defined by in-house protocols for PTV and organs at risk (rectum wall, bladder wall, sigmoid colon and small intestine). If all dose constraints were satisfied, the plan was defined as an optimal plan (OP).
RESULTS: An OP was achieved with 203 patients (84%). Mean bladder volume (± 1 SD) was 266 ml (± 130 ml) among those with an OP and 214 ml (±130 ml) among those without an OP (p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis also showed that bladder volumes below 150 ml decreased the possibility of achieving an OP. However, the percentage of patients with an OP showed a plateau effect at bladder volumes above 150 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder volume is a significant factor affecting OP rates. However, our results suggest that bladder volumes exceeding 150 ml may not help meet planning dose constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22132747     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.639388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

1.  Does transperitoneal minimally invasive radical prostatectomy increase the amount of small bowel receiving salvage radiation?

Authors:  Murilo A Luz; Alan Dal Pra; Hin-Yu Vincent Tu; Marie Duclos; Fabio L B Cury; Bassel G Bachir; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Assessment of an ultrasound bladder scanner in prostate radiotherapy: A validation study and analysis of bladder filling variability.

Authors:  L Smith; J Gittins; K V Ramnarine; Eml Chung
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-02-22

3.  Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arne Grün; Michael Kawgan-Kagan; David Kaul; Harun Badakhshi; Carmen Stromberger; Volker Budach; Dirk Böhmer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Utility of Smart Arc CDR for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shogo Hatanaka; Seiichi Tamaki; Haruna Endo; Norifumi Mizuno; Naoki Nakamura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Monte Carlo Simulations for Dosimetry in Prostate Radiotherapy with Different Intravesical Volumes and Planning Target Volume Margins.

Authors:  Wei Lv; Dong Yu; Hengda He; Qian Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.