Literature DB >> 22132685

The association between perceived sweetness intensity and dietary intake in young adults.

Sara Cicerale1, Lynnette J Riddell, Russell S J Keast.   

Abstract

Individual differences in taste perception may influence dietary habits, nutritional status, and ultimately nutrition-related chronic disease risk. Individual differences in sweetness intensity perception and the relationship between perceived sweetness intensity, food behaviors, and dietary intake was investigated in 85 adults. Subjects (body mass index [BMI]= 21 ± 3, 21 ± 4 y) completed a food and diet questionnaire, food variety survey, 2 24-h food records, and a perceived sweetness intensity measurement using the general labeled magnitude scale (gLMS). There was interindividual variation in perceived sweetness intensity (0 to 34 gLMS units, mean 10 ± 7). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no difference between perceived sweetness intensity and degree of importance placed on not adding sugar to tea or coffee (P = 0.2) and the degree of importance placed on avoiding sugar-sweetened or fizzy drinks (P = 1.0). Independent t-test analysis revealed no significant association between perceived sweetness intensity and the food variety measure for sugar and confectionary intake (P = 0.6) and selected fruit and vegetable intake (P = 0.1 to 0.9). One-way ANOVA also demonstrated no difference between tertiles of sweetness intensity and BMI (P = 0.1), age (P = 0.3), and food variety score (P = 0.5). No correlation was observed with regards to perceived sweetness intensity and mean total energy (kJ) intake (r = 0.05, P = 0.7), percent energy from total fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrate, and grams of fiber (r =-0.1 to 0.1, P = 0.2 to 0.8) and also for intake of the micronutrients: folate, magnesium, calcium, iron, and zinc (r = 0.1 to 0.2, P = 0.1 to 0.4). Only modest correlations were observed between sodium (r = 0.3, P < 0.05), vitamin C (r = 0.3, P < 0.05), and potassium (r = 0.2, P < 0.0) intake and perceived sweetness intensity. Overall, perceived sweetness intensity does not appear to play a role in food behaviors relating to sugar consumption and dietary intake in adults.
© 2011 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22132685     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02473.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  12 in total

1.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  The role of sweet taste in satiation and satiety.

Authors:  Yu Qing Low; Kathleen Lacy; Russell Keast
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans.

Authors:  Julia Y Q Low; Kathleen E Lacy; Robert L McBride; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is Sweet Taste Perception Associated with Sweet Food Liking and Intake?

Authors:  Shakeela N Jayasinghe; Rozanne Kruger; Daniel C I Walsh; Guojiao Cao; Stacey Rivers; Marilize Richter; Bernhard H Breier
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners.

Authors:  Julia Y Q Low; Robert L McBride; Kathleen E Lacy; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Taste Sensitivity Is Associated with Food Consumption Behavior but not with Recalled Pleasantness.

Authors:  Sari Puputti; Ulla Hoppu; Mari Sandell
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-09-27

7.  Intraoral Microbial Metabolism and Association with Host Taste Perception.

Authors:  A Gardner; P W So; G H Carpenter
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  The Association between Sweet Taste Function, Anthropometry, and Dietary Intake in Adults.

Authors:  Julia Y Q Low; Kathleen E Lacy; Robert McBride; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Sweet/Fat Preference Taste in Subjects Who are Lean, Obese and Very Obese.

Authors:  Jennifer Leohr; Maria C Kjellsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Sweet Taste Preference: Relationships with Other Tastes, Liking for Sugary Foods and Exploratory Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Rebeca Fernández-Carrión; Jose V Sorlí; Oscar Coltell; Eva C Pascual; Carolina Ortega-Azorín; Rocío Barragán; Ignacio M Giménez-Alba; Andrea Alvarez-Sala; Montserrat Fitó; Jose M Ordovas; Dolores Corella
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.