| Literature DB >> 22132340 |
Mohamed El-Khalawany1, Al-Sadat Mosbeh, Fatma Abd-Al Salam, Amany Abou-Bakr.
Abstract
Granular cell tumor (GCT) is uncommonly presented with cutaneous ulcer. We examined the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of this ulcerative form in fourteen cases that may raise the awareness of this variant. The study included 11 males and 3 females with a mean age 31.5 ± 7.42 years. All cases were presented with large solitary ulcer with indurated base, elevated border, skin colored margin, and necrotic floor. Twelve lesions were located on the extremities and two lesions on the genital region. Histologically, the lesions showed dermal infiltrate composed of large polygonal cells with granular cytoplasm and characteristic infiltration of the dermal muscles in all cases. Immunostaining showed positive reaction for S100 (14/14), NSE (14/14), CD68 (5/14), and Vimentin (7/14) while HMB45, CK, EMA, and Desmin were negative. We hope that this paper increases the awareness of ulcerative GCT and consider it in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative lesions.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22132340 PMCID: PMC3206371 DOI: 10.1155/2011/497648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Skin Cancer ISSN: 2090-2913
Figure 1GCT presented with a solitary large ulcerative lesion on the arm (a) and scrotum (b).
Figure 2Ill-defined diffuse dermal infiltrate with overlying epidermal acanthosis (a). The tumor cells are large with granular cytoplasm (b) (H&E ×100 and ×1000).
Figure 3The erector pili muscle is characteristically infiltrated by the tumor cells: H&E (a and b), Masson Trichrome (c), and S100 stain (d) (×1000).
Figure 4The tumor cells show PAS-positive cytoplasmic granules (a), strong positive immunostaining for S100 (b), and NSE (c) but weakly stained with CD68 (d) (×1000).
The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of ulcerative GCT.
| Clinical data | |
|---|---|
| (i) Age (years) | |
| Range | 17–42 y. |
| Mean ± SD | 31.5 ± 7.42 |
|
| |
| (ii) Sex | |
| Males/females | 11/3 |
| Ratio | 3.6 : 1 |
|
| |
| (iii) Duration of the lesion (months) | |
| Range | 23–51 m. |
| Mean ± SD | 37.2 ± 8.32 |
|
| |
| (iv) Time of 2ry ulceration (months) | |
| Range | 19–41 m. |
| Mean ± SD | 31.5 ± 6.71 |
|
| |
| (v) Location | |
| Extremities | 12 (5 arm, 2 forearm, 3 foot, 1 leg and 1 thigh) |
| Anogenital | 1 scrotum and 1 perineum |
|
| |
| (vi) Size of the base (cm) | |
| Range | 3.8 × 3.5–5.2 × 5.1 |
| Average | 4.1 × 3.9 |
|
| |
| Histological features | |
|
| |
| (I) Epidermal changes | Acanthosis: 11 |
| Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: 3 | |
|
| |
| (ii) Cellular infiltrate | Dermal: 12 |
| Dermal and subcutaneous: 2 | |
|
| |
| (iii) Appendageal infiltrate | Muscle infiltrate: 14 |
|
| |
| (iv) PAS stain | Strong positive: 10 |
| Weak positive: 4 | |
|
| |
| Immunohistochemical features | |
|
| |
| (i) Positive staining | S100 and NSE: 14 (all strong) |
| Vimentin: 7 (6 strong–1 weak) | |
| CD68 : 5 (all weak) | |
|
| |
| (ii) Negative staining | Desmin, HMB45, EMA and CK |