| Literature DB >> 22131974 |
Clemens Möller1, Harry Witchel.
Abstract
The field of automated patch-clamp electrophysiology has emerged from the tension between the pharmaceutical industry's need for high-throughput compound screening versus its need to be conservative due to regulatory requirements. On the one hand, hERG channel screening was increasingly requested for new chemical entities, as the correlation between blockade of the ion channel coded by hERG and torsades de pointes cardiac arrhythmia gained increasing attention. On the other hand, manual patch-clamping, typically quoted as the "gold-standard" for understanding ion channel function and modulation, was far too slow (and, consequently, too expensive) for keeping pace with the numbers of compounds submitted for hERG channel investigations from pharmaceutical R&D departments. In consequence it became more common for some pharmaceutical companies to outsource safety pharmacological investigations, with a focus on hERG channel interactions. This outsourcing has allowed those pharmaceutical companies to build up operational flexibility and greater independence from internal resources, and allowed them to obtain access to the latest technological developments that emerged in automated patch-clamp electrophysiology - much of which arose in specialized biotech companies. Assays for nearly all major cardiac ion channels are now available by automated patch-clamping using heterologous expression systems, and recently, automated action potential recordings from stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes have been demonstrated. Today, most of the large pharmaceutical companies have acquired automated electrophysiology robots and have established various automated cardiac ion channel safety screening assays on these, in addition to outsourcing parts of their needs for safety screening.Entities:
Keywords: LQT; action potential; automated patch-clamp; cardiac ion channel; hERG; planar patch-clamp; stem cell; torsades de pointes
Year: 2011 PMID: 22131974 PMCID: PMC3222877 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Ionic activity during the cardiac ventricular action potential. (A) An idealized ventricular action potential (AP) is shown in the top panel; the upward slope represents depolarization (positive voltages), and the downward slope repolarization (negative voltages). Arrows indicate the effects of the dominant currents on the potential: during the plateau phase, depolarizing calcium currents, and repolarizing potassium currents balance each other. (B) The main transmembrane ionic currents contributing to the AP over time; inward (depolarizing) currents are shown below each axis, and outward (repolarizing) currents are shown above each axis. Relative polarities and time courses are indicated; relative amplitudes are not to scale. IKr Rapid delayed rectifier current. Adapted with permission from Witchel (2011).
Figure 2Representative hERG channel whole-cell current–voltage relationships by manual and automated patch-clamp electrophysiology from CHO cells stably expressing the channel. The characteristic bell-shaped current–voltage relation can be clearly seen during both partial repolarization phases [different current–voltage protocols for recording hERG channel currents have been described in the literature (e.g., Hancox et al., 1998; Su et al., 2004, 2009; Deisemann et al., 2008)]. (A) Recorded by manual patch-clamp using the following stimulation protocol: cells were held at −80 mV, depolarized to +20 mV for 1 s, and repolarized in steps from −120 to +40 mV in 10 mV intervals for 1 s each. Stimulation frequency was 0.1 Hz. (B) Recorded by automated planar patch-clamp on the Patchliner (Nanion Technologies) using the following stimulation protocol: cells were held at −80 mV, depolarized to +40 mV for 500 ms, and repolarized in steps from −140 to +40 mV in 20 mV intervals for 500 ms each. Stimulation frequency was 0.1 Hz. Adapted with permission from Moeller (2010). For more experimental details see Davenport et al. (2010).