Literature DB >> 22131888

University multi-user facility survey-2010.

Melissa B Riley1.   

Abstract

Multi-user facilities serve as a resource for many universities. In 2010, a survey was conducted investigating possible changes and successful characteristics of multi-user facilities, as well as identifying problems in facilities. Over 300 surveys were e-mailed to persons identified from university websites as being involved with multi-user facilities. Complete responses were received from 36 facilities with an average of 20 years of operation. Facilities were associated with specific departments (22%), colleges (22%), and university research centers (8.3%) or were not affiliated with any department or college within the university (47%). The five most important factors to succeed as a multi-user facility were: 1) maintaining an experienced, professional staff in an open atmosphere; 2) university-level support providing partial funding; 3) broad client base; 4) instrument training programs; and 5) an effective leader and engaged strategic advisory group. The most significant problems were: 1) inadequate university financial support and commitment; 2) problems recovering full service costs from university subsidies and user fees; 3) availability of funds to repair and upgrade equipment; 4) inability to retain highly qualified staff; and 5) unqualified users dirtying/damaging equipment. Further information related to these issues and to fee structure was solicited. Overall, there appeared to be a decline in university support for facilities and more emphasis on securing income by serving clients outside of the institution and by obtaining grants from entities outside of the university.

Entities:  

Keywords:  core laboratory; core personnel; institutional facilities; institutional support; instrumentation

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22131888      PMCID: PMC3221449     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  3 in total

1.  Biotechnology core laboratories: An overview.

Authors:  D A McMillen; L Bibbs; N Denslow; K M Ivanetich; C Naeve; R L Niece; S Tindall
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2000-03

2.  Association of biomolecular resource facilities survey: service laboratory funding.

Authors:  Rachel Ogorzalek Loo; Charles M Nicolet; Ronald L Niece; Mary Young; John T Simpson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2009-07

3.  Biotechnology core facilities: trends and update.

Authors:  K M Ivanetich; R L Niece; M Rohde; E Fowler; T K Hayes
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities.

Authors:  Julie A Dragon; Chris Gates; Shannan Ho Sui; John N Hutchinson; R Krishna Murthy Karuturi; Alper Kucukural; Shawn Polson; Alberto Riva; Matthew Lee Settles; Jyothi Thimmapuram; Stuart S Levine
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.