Literature DB >> 22131880

A novel topoisomerase inhibitor, daurinol, suppresses growth of HCT116 cells with low hematological toxicity compared to etoposide.

Kyungsu Kang1, Seung Hyun Oh, Ji Ho Yun, Eun Hye Jho, Ju-Hee Kang, Dulamjav Batsuren, Jigjidsuren Tunsag, Kwang Hwa Park, Minkyun Kim, Chu Won Nho.   

Abstract

We report that daurinol, a novel arylnaphthalene lignan, is a promising potential anticancer agent with adverse effects that are less severe than those of etoposide, a clinical anticancer agent. Despite its potent antitumor activity, clinical use of etoposide is limited because of its adverse effects, including myelosuppression and the development of secondary leukemia. Here, we comprehensively compared the mechanistic differences between daurinol and etoposide because they have similar chemical structures. Etoposide, a topoisomerase II poison, is known to attenuate cancer cell proliferation through the inhibition of DNA synthesis. Etoposide treatment induces G(2)/M arrest, severe DNA damage, and the formation of giant nuclei in HCT116 cells. We hypothesized that the induction of DNA damage and nuclear enlargement due to abnormal chromosomal conditions could give rise to genomic instability in both tumor cells and in actively dividing normal cells, resulting in the toxic adverse effects of etoposide. We found that daurinol is a catalytic inhibitor of human topoisomerase IIa, and it induces S-phase arrest through the enhanced expression of cyclins E and A and by activation of the ATM/Chk/Cdc25A pathway in HCT116 cells. However, daurinol treatment did not cause DNA damage or nuclear enlargement in vitro. Finally, we confirmed the in vivo antitumor effects and adverse effects of daurinol and etoposide in nude mice xenograft models. Daurinol displayed potent antitumor effects without any significant loss of body weight or changes in hematological parameters, whereas etoposide treatment led to decreased body weight and white blood cell, red blood cell, and hemoglobin concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22131880      PMCID: PMC3223608          DOI: 10.1593/neo.11972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  45 in total

Review 1.  Checking on DNA damage in S phase.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how?

Authors:  Hisao Masai; Seiji Matsumoto; Zhiying You; Naoko Yoshizawa-Sugata; Masako Oda
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Prolonged quercetin administration diminishes the etoposide-induced DNA damage in bone marrow cells of rats.

Authors:  Maria Kapiszewska; Agnieszka Cierniak; Monika A Papiez; Agata Pietrzycka; Marek Stepniewski; Adam Lomnicki
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Wogonin potentiates the antitumor action of etoposide and ameliorates its adverse effects.

Authors:  Riyo Enomoto; Chika Koshiba; Chie Suzuki; Eibai Lee
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Role of checkpoint kinase 1 in preventing premature mitosis in response to gemcitabine.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Alefiyah K Mesiwala; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Cancer therapy-induced residual bone marrow injury-Mechanisms of induction and implication for therapy.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Virginia Probin; Daohong Zhou
Journal:  Curr Cancer Ther Rev       Date:  2006-08-01

7.  Tectoridin, a poor ligand of estrogen receptor alpha, exerts its estrogenic effects via an ERK-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Kyungsu Kang; Saet Byoul Lee; Sang Hoon Jung; Kwang Hyun Cha; Woo Dong Park; Young Chang Sohn; Chu Won Nho
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 8.  Cell cycle checkpoints and their impact on anticancer therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Alan Eastman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Cellular responses to etoposide: cell death despite cell cycle arrest and repair of DNA damage.

Authors:  Ilona Schonn; Jana Hennesen; Dorothee C Dartsch
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The chemopreventive effects of Saussurea salicifolia through induction of apoptosis and phase II detoxification enzyme.

Authors:  Kyungsu Kang; Hee Ju Lee; Chul Young Kim; Saet Byoul Lee; Jigjidsuren Tunsag; Dulamjav Batsuren; Chu Won Nho
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.233

View more
  23 in total

1.  The interconnectedness of cancer cell signaling.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Cancer subclonal genetic architecture as a key to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of derivatives of the phyllanthusmin class of arylnaphthalene lignan lactones.

Authors:  John L Woodard; Andrew C Huntsman; Pratiq A Patel; Hee-Byung Chai; Ragu Kanagasabai; Soumendrakrishna Karmahapatra; Alexandria N Young; Yulin Ren; Malcolm S Cole; Denisse Herrera; Jack C Yalowich; A Douglas Kinghorn; Joanna E Burdette; James R Fuchs
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  PNAS-4, an Early DNA Damage Response Gene, Induces S Phase Arrest and Apoptosis by Activating Checkpoint Kinases in Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Zhu Yuan; Wenhao Guo; Jun Yang; Lei Li; Meiliang Wang; Yi Lei; Yang Wan; Xinyu Zhao; Na Luo; Ping Cheng; Xinyu Liu; Chunlai Nie; Yong Peng; Aiping Tong; Yuquan Wei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Etoposide Free Concentrations in Solid Tumor.

Authors:  Maiara Cássia Pigatto; Bibiana Verlindo de Araujo; Bruna Gaelzer Silva Torres; Stephan Schmidt; Paolo Magni; Teresa Dalla Costa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Measuring the Effect of Chemicals on the Growth and Reproduction of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  So Young Lee; Kyungsu Kang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Electroacupuncture upregulates ERK signaling pathways and promotes adult hippocampal neural progenitors proliferation in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Liu Yang; Na Yue; Xiaocang Zhu; Qiuqin Han; Qiong Liu; Jin Yu; Gencheng Wu
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Overcoming intratumor heterogeneity of polygenic cancer drug resistance with improved biomarker integration.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 9.  Secondary leukemia associated with the anti-cancer agent, etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor.

Authors:  Sachiko Ezoe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Assessment of Cr(VI)-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity using high content analysis.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Yuriy Fedorov; Daniel D Brown; Mina Suh; Deborah M Proctor; Liz Kuriakose; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.