Literature DB >> 22130966

Does location matter? Prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging by vascular territory.

Hanna B Slim1, Sanjeev U Nair, Sabeena Arora, Gary V Heller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The location of a myocardial perfusion abnormality frequently affects clinical decision making, especially if the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory is involved. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the location of abnormalities on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging affects outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 21,294 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who underwent exercise or pharmacological stress SPECT over a 10-year period. Using the ASNC 17-segment model, 2 observers interpreted images with regards to defect severity, size, and reversibility. The summed stress score (SSS) was used in relation to vascular territories [LAD, right coronary artery (RCA), and left circumflex artery (LCx)]. All patients were followed over a mean period of 2.5 ± 2 years for cardiac events (cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction).
RESULTS: Of the enrolled patients, 5,676 had single-vessel territory defects with a mean SSS of 4.3 ± 2.8. Cardiac event-free survival curves revealed no significant difference between the 3 locations (LAD, RCA, and LCx) (P = .235). When compared by mild (2-3), moderate (4-8), or severe (>8) SSS, outcomes between the 3 groups were again similar. There were 2,907 patients with two-vessel territory defects with a mean SSS of 10.8. Outcomes were similar between the following 2 groups: two-vessel with LAD involvement and two-vessel without LAD involvement (P = .558).
CONCLUSION: In patients with single- or two-vessel territory perfusion abnormalities with similar size and severity of perfusion defects, the location of defect did not impact future cardiac events. Location of myocardial perfusion defect on SPECT imaging may not be helpful in clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130966     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9486-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  13 in total

1.  Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Kim; Y S Kwok; P Heagerty; R Redberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  K E Fleischmann; M G Hunink; K M Kuntz; P S Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prognostic significance of the location of wall motion abnormalities during exercise echocardiography.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Douglas W Mahoney; Bijoy K Khandheria; Timothy E Paterick; Kelli N Burger; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Predictive value of quantitative dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy in assessing cardiovascular risk after vascular surgery in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S E Lane; S M Lewis; J J Pippin; E J Kosinski; D Campbell; R W Nesto; T Hill
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparison of medicine alone, coronary angioplasty, and left internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass for one-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A B Greenbaum; R M Califf; R H Jones; L H Gardner; H R Phillips; M H Sketch; R S Stack; J A Puma
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does the location of perfusion defects matter? An old question with a new answer.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Waqas Qureshi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond Y Kwong; Gregg W Stone; Roxy Senior; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Jennifer H Mieres; Thomas H Marwick; Lawrence M Phillips; Farooq A Chaudhry; Patricia A Pellikka; Piotr Slomka; Andrew E Arai; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Todd D Miller; Eike Nagel; Abhinav Goyal; Salvador Borges-Neto; William E Boden; Harmony R Reynolds; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06

3.  Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Mastrocola; Barbara Juarez Amorim; João Vicente Vitola; Simone Cristina Soares Brandão; Gabriel Blacher Grossman; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Rafael Willain Lopes; William Azem Chalela; Lara Cristiane Terra Ferreira Carreira; José Roberto Nolasco de Araújo; Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita; José Claudio Meneghetti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Focal impairment in myocardial fatty acid imaging in the left anterior descending artery area, a strong predictor for cardiac death in hemodialysis patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Masato Nishimura; Tetsuya Hashimoto; Nagara Tamaki; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Toshihiko Ono
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 9.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.