Literature DB >> 22130481

How are reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity addressed in REACH dossiers?

Costanza Rovida1, Fabiola Longo, Richard R Rabbit.   

Abstract

The first deadline for REACH registration has passed and registration data for the first set of substances are now public. According to ECHA, 4,599 substances have been registered so far, and the corresponding dossiers of many of them are now partially available in a public database. A sample of 400 records was randomly selected and analyzed with regard to reproductive and developmental toxicity. Most dossiers do not follow the strict requirements in the official guidelines, and some dossiers lack some very basic information. A broad variety of existing data is used, and the read-across opportunity is very much exploited. Surprisingly, a number of in vivo tests have been performed already, apparently for REACH purposes, in spite of the legal requirement to make a public proposal and wait for authorization by ECHA. The number of animals used so far, plus the number of animals that will derive from testing proposals of the first REACH deadline, is very high; it may add up to 1.6 million animals just to accomplish reproductive and developmental toxicity endpoints if the data collected from 400 dossiers are extrapolated to the total number of registered substances. In vitro tests are completely absent, even though there are many tests that may be used to complement either read-across strategies or partially reliable existing data. It is recommended, in the spirit of REACH, to protect human health through an in-depth assessment of the chemicals and simultaneously, to promote the use of in vitro alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130481     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2011.4.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  10 in total

Review 1.  Developmental neurotoxicity - challenges in the 21st century and in vitro opportunities.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Helena T Hogberg; Marcel Leist; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 2.  Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Philip J Landrigan
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Fingerprinting of neurotoxic compounds using a mouse embryonic stem cell dual luminescence reporter assay.

Authors:  Marilena Colaianna; Sten Ilmjärv; Hedi Peterson; Ilse Kern; Stephanie Julien; Mathurin Baquié; Giorgia Pallocca; Sieto Bosgra; Agapios Sachinidis; Jan G Hengstler; Marcel Leist; Karl-Heinz Krause
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Mark T D Cronin; Jie Shen; Karen Blackburn; Ewan D Booth; Mounir Bouhifd; Elizabeth Donley; Laura Egnash; Charles Hastings; Daland R Juberg; Andre Kleensang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; E Dinant Kroese; Adam C Lee; Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Sue Marty; Jorge M Naciff; Jessica Palmer; David Pamies; Mike Penman; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Daniel P Russo; Sharon B Stuard; Grace Patlewicz; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Shengde Wu; Hao Zhu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  3S - Systematic, systemic, and systems biology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Raffaella Corvi; Andre Levchenko; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.043

6.  Multi-Strategy Assessment of Different Uses of QSAR under REACH Analysis of Alternatives to Advance Information Transparency.

Authors:  Kazue Chinen; Timothy Malloy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Profiling of drugs and environmental chemicals for functional impairment of neural crest migration in a novel stem cell-based test battery.

Authors:  B Zimmer; G Pallocca; N Dreser; S Foerster; T Waldmann; J Westerhout; S Julien; K H Krause; C van Thriel; J G Hengstler; A Sachinidis; S Bosgra; M Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals: example lists and criteria for their selection and use.

Authors:  Michael Aschner; Sandra Ceccatelli; Mardas Daneshian; Ellen Fritsche; Nina Hasiwa; Thomas Hartung; Helena T Hogberg; Marcel Leist; Abby Li; William R Mundi; Stephanie Padilla; Aldert H Piersma; Anna Bal-Price; Andrea Seiler; Remco H Westerink; Bastian Zimmer; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.043

9.  Machine Learning of Toxicological Big Data Enables Read-Across Structure Activity Relationships (RASAR) Outperforming Animal Test Reproducibility.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Dan Marsh; Craig Rowlands; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  ERGO: Breaking Down the Wall between Human Health and Environmental Testing of Endocrine Disrupters.

Authors:  Henrik Holbech; Peter Matthiessen; Martin Hansen; Gerrit Schüürmann; Dries Knapen; Marieke Reuver; Frédéric Flamant; Laurent Sachs; Werner Kloas; Klara Hilscherova; Marc Leonard; Jürgen Arning; Volker Strauss; Taisen Iguchi; Lisa Baumann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.