Literature DB >> 22130438

Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Marcelle M Nascimento1, Valeria V Gordan, Vibeke Qvist, James D Bader, D Brad Rindal, O Dale Williams, Daniel Gewartowski, Jeffrey L Fellows, Mark S Litaker, Gregg H Gilbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to quantify the reasons for restoring noncarious tooth defects (NCTDs) by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) and to assess the tooth, patient and dentist characteristics associated with those reasons.
METHODS: Data were collected by 178 DPBRN dentists regarding the placement of 1,301 consecutive restorations owing to NCTDs. Information gathered included the main clinical reason, other than dental caries, for restoration of previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces; characteristics of patients who received treatment; dentists' and dental practices' characteristics; teeth and surfaces restored; and restorative materials used.
RESULTS: Dentists most often placed restorations to treat lesions caused by abrasion, abfraction or erosion (AAE) (46 percent) and tooth fracture (31 percent). Patients 41 years or older received restorations mainly because of AAE (P < .001). Premolars and anterior teeth were restored mostly owing to AAE; molars were restored mostly owing to tooth fracture (P < .001). Dentists used directly placed resin-based composite (RBC) largely to restore AAE lesions and fractured teeth (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among DPBRN practices, AAE and tooth fracture were the main reasons for restoring noncarious tooth surfaces. Pre-molars and anterior teeth of patients 41 years and older are most likely to receive restorations owing to AAE; molars are most likely to receive restorations owing to tooth fracture. Dentists restored both types of NCTDs most often with RBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130438      PMCID: PMC3229176          DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  46 in total

1.  Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans.

Authors:  B T Piotrowski; W B Gillette; E B Hancock
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  A simple method to estimate restoration volume as a possible predictor for tooth fracture.

Authors:  J R Sturdevant; J D Bader; D A Shugars; T C Steet
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: a re-evaluation.

Authors:  Luis A Litonjua; Sebastiano Andreana; Peter J Bush; Thomas S Tobias; Robert E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.

Authors:  William W Brackett; Alejandro Dib; Martha Goël Brackett; Adriana A Reyes; Blanca E Estrada
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

5.  The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition.

Authors:  J Borcic; I Anic; M M Urek; S Ferreri
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Ruud H Kuijs; Cees M Kreulen; F Joost M Roeters; Nico H J Creugers; Rob C W Burgersdijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Age-induced changes in the teeth and their attachment apparatus.

Authors:  W Ketterl
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Risk indicators for posterior tooth fracture.

Authors:  James D Bader; Daniel A Shugars; Jean A Martin
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Non-carious cervical lesions in a Nigerian population: abrasion or abfraction?

Authors:  A O Oginni; A O Olusile; C I Udoye
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Fractures of posterior teeth in adults.

Authors:  W S Eakle; E H Maxwell; B V Braly
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Progression of non-carious cervical lesions: 3D morphological analysis.

Authors:  Meiken Hayashi; Shisei Kubo; Patricia N R Pereira; Masaomi Ikeda; Tomohiro Takagaki; Toru Nikaido; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Calcium Silicate-Based Biocompatible Light-Curable Dental Material for Dental Pulpal Complex.

Authors:  Sung-Min Park; Woo-Rim Rhee; Kyu-Min Park; Yu-Jin Kim; Junyong Ahn; Jonathan C Knowles; Jongbin Kim; Jisun Shin; Tae-Su Jang; Soo-Kyung Jun; Hae-Hyoung Lee; Jung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.076

3.  Opinions on Dental Erosive Lesions, Knowledge of Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies among Norwegian Dentists: A Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Aida Mulic; Simen Vidnes-Kopperud; Anne B Skaare; Anne Bjørg Tveit; Alix Young
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 4.  Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options.

Authors:  Marcelle M Nascimento; Deborah A Dilbone; Patricia Nr Pereira; Wagner R Duarte; Saulo Geraldeli; Alex J Delgado
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2016-05-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.