Literature DB >> 22130294

Impact of the CKD-EPI equation for estimating renal function on eligibility for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer.

Che-Kai Tsao1, Erin Moshier, Sonia M Seng, James Godbold, Steven Grossman, Jonathan Winston, William K Oh, Matthew D Galsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of <60 mL/min, as calculated by the Cockroft-Gault (CG) equation, is a commonly used threshold for "cisplatin-ineligibility," the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation has recently emerged as a more accurate method of estimating renal function. We sought to determine the impact of using the CKD-EPI equation for estimating renal function on cisplatin eligibility.
METHODS: All patients pathologically diagnosed with muscle invasive and/or metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma (T2-4, N or M positive) at Mount Sinai Medical Center between January 1, 2000, and January 27, 2011, were identified. For each patient, CrCl was estimated by using the CG equation and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by using the CKD-EPI equation. The patients were considered cisplatin-ineligible if CrCl <60 mL/min or if GFR was <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2).
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included. The median CrCl estimated by CG was 58.93 mL/min, whereas the median GFR estimated by CKD-EPI was 64.67 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). When using the CG formula, 53% of our cohort was cisplatin ineligible, whereas 46% of the cohort was ineligible when using the CKD-EPI formula. The probability of deeming a patient ineligible when using the CG formula was 17% higher than the probability of deeming a patient ineligible when using the CKD-EPI formula: PR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.34); P = .0203.
CONCLUSION: In our retrospective study, the CKD-EPI formula was less likely to deem a patient ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy compared with the CG formula. This finding was hypothesis generating, and prospective evaluation is necessary to determine the clinical relevance of using this more accurate method of renal function assessment in chemotherapy decision making.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130294     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2011.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  14 in total

1.  The method of GFR determination impacts the estimation of cisplatin eligibility in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Horn; Barbara Ladwein; Tobias Maurer; Jutta Redlin; Anna Katharina Seitz; Jürgen E Gschwend; Margitta Retz; Hubert R Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Treatment Approaches for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

Review 3.  Increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kirk A Keegan; Harras B Zaid; Sanjay G Patel; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Estimation of Kidney Function in Oncology: Implications for Anticancer Drug Selection and Dosing.

Authors:  Morgan A Casal; Thomas D Nolin; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Discrepancies between the Cockcroft-Gault and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Equations: Implications for Refining Drug Dosage Adjustment Strategies.

Authors:  Pierre Delanaye; Fabrice Guerber; André Scheen; Timothy Ellam; Antoine Bouquegneau; Dorra Guergour; Christophe Mariat; Hans Pottel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Impact of acute kidney injury defined by CTCAE v4.0 during first course of cisplatin-based chemotherapy on treatment outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients.

Authors:  Ryutaro Ishitsuka; Jun Miyazaki; Daishi Ichioka; Takamitsu Inoue; Susumu Kageyama; Mikio Sugimoto; Koji Mitsuzuka; Yoshiyuki Matsui; Yusuke Shiraishi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Hironobu Wakeda; Takeshi Nomoto; Eiji Kikuchi; Koji Kawai; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 7.  Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Di Maria Jiang; Shilpa Gupta; Abhijat Kitchlu; Alejandro Meraz-Munoz; Scott A North; Nimira S Alimohamed; Normand Blais; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury After the First Course of Cisplatin.

Authors:  Shveta S Motwani; Gearoid M McMahon; Benjamin D Humphreys; Ann H Partridge; Sushrut S Waikar; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase II trial of combination nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine in first line therapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ajjai Alva; Stephanie Daignault; David C Smith; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Comparison of Equations To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate and Their Impact on Frequency of Cisplatin-associated Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Shveta S Motwani; Toni K Choueiri; Ann H Partridge; Jiani Hu; Marina D Kaymakcalan; Sushrut S Waikar; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.