INTRODUCTION: Objectively measuring the effect of primary care process interventions is very challenging. Real time location systems (RTLS) hold the potential to solve this problem. METHODS: An outpatient clinic was outfitted with a RTLS based on active-RFID (radiofrequency identification). Staff and patients volunteered to wear RFID transponders which unobtrusively recorded time and location. Wearers were identified only by their role: Patient, MA, RN, MD. The clinical process intervention consisted of reorganizing how medical assistants were utilized from a ad hoc common pool of medical assistants to dedicated assignment of medical assistants. Process measures were recorded before, during and after the intervention. RESULTS: 230 unique patient encounters were recorded from October 2009-January 2010. Eight MDs, 7 MA and 6 RNs participated. Total flow time was significantly decreased while waiting room time was increased. Variance was significantly reduced for both total flow time and face time. In-room wait time and patient face time were decreased, though this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Objectively measuring process change in primary care is feasible using RTLS. In this case the intervention resulted in the waiting room being used more effectively as a process buffer smoothing flow and potentially increasing clinic capacity.
INTRODUCTION: Objectively measuring the effect of primary care process interventions is very challenging. Real time location systems (RTLS) hold the potential to solve this problem. METHODS: An outpatient clinic was outfitted with a RTLS based on active-RFID (radiofrequency identification). Staff and patients volunteered to wear RFID transponders which unobtrusively recorded time and location. Wearers were identified only by their role: Patient, MA, RN, MD. The clinical process intervention consisted of reorganizing how medical assistants were utilized from a ad hoc common pool of medical assistants to dedicated assignment of medical assistants. Process measures were recorded before, during and after the intervention. RESULTS: 230 unique patient encounters were recorded from October 2009-January 2010. Eight MDs, 7 MA and 6 RNs participated. Total flow time was significantly decreased while waiting room time was increased. Variance was significantly reduced for both total flow time and face time. In-room wait time and patient face time were decreased, though this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Objectively measuring process change in primary care is feasible using RTLS. In this case the intervention resulted in the waiting room being used more effectively as a process buffer smoothing flow and potentially increasing clinic capacity.
Authors: John A Musser; Juno Cho; Amy Cohn; Leslie M Niziol; Dena Ballouz; David T Burke; Paula Anne Newman-Casey Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 2.086
Authors: Kevin M Overmann; Danny T Y Wu; Catherine T Xu; Shwetha S Bindhu; Lindsey Barrick Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 4.497