Literature DB >> 22129812

Traction on the cervix in theatre before anterior repair: Does it tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy?

Richard Foon1, Wael Agur, Alianu Kingsly, Paul White, Phillip Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical outcome of uterine preservation during anterior colporrhaphy, in women with apparent uterine descent, after the application of validated cervical traction under anaesthesia. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in the United Kingdom. Thirty five patients with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse (stage 2 or more) with the cervix, pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) point C, at or higher than -3 cm (stage 1), who had requested surgical repair, were recruited. In all patients there was no evidence of apical descent, with point D at -8 cm or above. All patients had a validated 'cervical traction' force applied intra-operatively to the cervix, and if the cervix, point C, did not come down further than 'stage 2' (+1cm) the uterus was conserved. These patients had an anterior repair, without a vaginal hysterectomy or apical support procedure, and were reviewed 3 months postoperatively. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS) and POP-Q scores were completed pre- and post-operatively, with another POPQ performed intraoperatively during validated cervical traction. The Wilcoxon test was used to look at differences in vaginal descent and also to compare specific items of the ICIQ.
RESULTS: In all 35 women, there was cervical descent below -1cm (stage 2) when a validated amount of cervical traction was applied. When examined at follow up, however, the cervix (point C) had returned to its preoperative, asymptomatic level (stage 1) in all except one patient. There was no significant change in the position of point C pre- and 3 months post- operatively. Only one of the 35 women required a subsequent vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse (2.86%, 95% CI 0.07-14.91%). Significant improvements in ICIQ-VS scores were observed following anterior repair with uterine conservation.
CONCLUSION: The degree of uterine descent with cervical traction under anaesthesia has not been shown to be helpful in assessing the need for vaginal hysterectomy at the time of vaginal repair. The 'cervical traction' test is therefore unnecessary, and the decision as to whether to perform a concomitant vaginal hysterectomy should be based on the clinical findings on examination in the clinic.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22129812     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  To pull or not to pull, that is the question…how should we define prolapse?

Authors:  Phillip Smith; Steven Swift; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Does pre-operative traction on the cervix approximate intra-operative uterine prolapse? Comment.

Authors:  Wael Agur; Richard Foon; Ruben Trochez; Phillip Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Traction force needed to reproduce physiologically observed uterine movement: technique development, feasibility assessment, and preliminary findings.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Jiajia Luo; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Does traction on the cervix under anaesthesia tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy? A 2-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chendrimada Madhu; Richard Foon; Wael Agur; Phillip Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  In vivo properties of uterine suspensory tissue in pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Tovia M Smith; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.

Authors:  Pichai Leerasiri; Parit Wachasiddhisilpa; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Chutimon Asumpinwong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  A novel technique to measure in vivo uterine suspensory ligament stiffness.

Authors:  Tovia Martirosian Smith; Jiajia Luo; Yvonne Hsu; James Ashton-Miller; John Oliver Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Effect of Cystocele Repair on Cervix Location in Women With Uterus In Situ.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Daniel M Morgan; Jenny George; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

9.  Apical descent in the office and the operating room: the effect of prolapse size.

Authors:  Erin C Crosby; Kristen M Sharp; Adrian Gasperut; John O L Delancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 10.  What's new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.927

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.