Literature DB >> 22129576

Systematic review of grading practice: is there evidence of grade inflation?

Jayne H Donaldson1, Morag Gray.   

Abstract

This paper describes the outcomes of a systematic review of literature pertaining to the grading of practice within nursing, midwifery, medicine and allied health professions. From a total of 215 papers, 147 were included and data were extracted using a systematic data extraction tool. The focus of this paper relates to one of the emerging themes: the issue of grade inflation. The paper examines the grade inflation phenomenon: it discusses the reasons for grade inflation from a variety of perspectives. The paper reports on the suggestions made within the literature on how to control grade inflation, but these, the authors conclude, are not fully evaluated and should be adopted only where rigorous evaluation can carried out. It is imperative that evaluations include the usefulness, reliability and validity testing of rubrics or any other solutions to grade inflation that are adopted by clinicians and educators. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22129576     DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract        ISSN: 1471-5953            Impact factor:   2.281


  2 in total

1.  The effect of indapamide vs. bendroflumethiazide for primary hypertension: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Filippo Pigazzani; Robert W V Flynn; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Clinical assessors' working conceptualisations of undergraduate consultation skills: a framework analysis of how assessors make expert judgements in practice.

Authors:  Catherine Hyde; Sarah Yardley; Janet Lefroy; Simon Gay; Robert K McKinley
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.853

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.