Literature DB >> 22128907

EMS providers' perceptions of safety climate and adherence to safe work practices.

Laura J Eliseo1, Kate A Murray, Laura F White, Sophia Dyer, Patricia A Mitchell, William G Fernandez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational injuries are an important source of morbidity for emergency medical services (EMS) providers. Previous work has shown that employee perceptions of an organization's commitment to safety (i.e., safety climate) correlate with adherence to safe practices.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between perceived safety climate and compliance with safety procedures in an urban EMS system with >100,000 calls/year.
METHODS: EMS providers were issued a self-administered survey that included questions on demographics, years of experience, perceived safety climate, and adherence to safety procedures. Safety climate was assessed with a 20-item validated instrument. Adherence to safety procedures was assessed with a nine-item list of safety behaviors. Strict adherence to safety procedures was defined as endorsing "agree" or "strongly agree" on 80% of items. The effect of safety climate on compliance with safe practices was estimated using multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six of 221 providers (89%) completed surveys; 74% were male; the median age was 36-40 years; and the median amount of experience was 8 years. One hundred twenty-seven of 196 respondents (65%) reported strict adherence to safe work practice. Factor analysis confirmed the original six-factor grouping of questions; frequent safety-related feedback/training was significantly associated with safe practices (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-4.51).
CONCLUSION: EMS workers perceiving a high degree of perceived safety climate was associated with twofold greater odds of self-reported level of strict adherence to safe work practices. Frequent safety-related feedback/training was the one dimension of safety climate that had the strongest association with adherence to safe workplace behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22128907     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2011.621043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  7 in total

1.  What influences safety in paramedicine? Understanding the impact of stress and fatigue on safety outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Donnelly; Paul Bradford; Matthew Davis; Cathie Hedges; Doug Socha; Peter Morassutti; Sathish Chandra Pichika
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-06-15

2.  Organizational Factors Are Key Predictors of Physicians' Confidence in Handling Workplace Violence.

Authors:  Fu-Li Chen; Wen-Hsuan Hou; Jin-Hua Chen; Tao-Hsin Tung; Jeng-Cheng Wu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Worksite safety climate, smoking, and the use of protective equipment by blue-collar building workers enrolled in the MassBUILT smoking cessation trial.

Authors:  Lauren M Dutra; Seung-Sup Kim; David R Williams; Ichiro Kawachi; Cassandra A Okechukwu
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas.

Authors:  Riyadh A Alhazmi; R David Parker; Sijin Wen
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.413

5.  Self-reported provider safety in an urban emergency medical system.

Authors:  Molly Furin; Laura J Eliseo; Breanne Langlois; William G Fernandez; Patricia Mitchell; K Sophia Dyer
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-02

6.  Development of a Work Climate Scale in Emergency Health Services.

Authors:  Susana Sanduvete-Chaves; José A Lozano-Lozano; Salvador Chacón-Moscoso; Francisco P Holgado-Tello
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Factors associated with physicians' behaviours to prevent needlestick and sharp injuries.

Authors:  Fu-Li Chen; Peter Y Chen; Jeng-Cheng Wu; Ying-Lin Chen; Tao-Hsin Tung; Yu-Wen Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.