Literature DB >> 22128550

Face viewpoint effects about three axes: the role of configural and featural processing.

Simone K Favelle1, Stephen Palmisano, Georgina Avery.   

Abstract

We directly compared recognition for faces following 0 degrees-75 degrees viewpoint rotation about the yaw, pitch, and roll axes. The aim was to determine the extent to which configural and featural information supported face recognition following rotations about each of these axes. Experiment 1 showed that performance on a sequential-matching task was viewpoint-dependent for all three types of rotation. The best face-recognition accuracy and shortest reaction time was found for roll rotations, then for yaw rotations, and finally the worst accuracy and slowest reaction time was found for pitch rotations. Directional differences in recognition were found for pitch rotations, but not for roll or yaw. Experiment 2 provided evidence that, in all three cases, viewpoint-dependent declines in recognition were primarily driven by the loss of configural information. However, it also appeared that significant featural information was lost following yaw and pitch (but not roll) rotations. Together, these findings show that unfamiliar-face recognition is viewpoint-dependent following rotation about each axis (and in each direction), and that performance is based on the availability of configural and, to a lesser extent, featural information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22128550     DOI: 10.1068/p6878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  7 in total

1.  View-adaptation reveals coding of face pose along image, not object, axes.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Nayar Valente
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on the Perception of Higher Cognitive Variables.

Authors:  Tobias M Schneider; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-09

3.  About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.

Authors:  Simone Favelle; Harold Hill; Peter Claes
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29

4.  Female Body Dissatisfaction and Attentional Bias to Body Images Evaluated Using Visual Search.

Authors:  John Cass; Georgina Giltrap; Daniel Talbot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-22

5.  Local features drive identity responses in macaque anterior face patches.

Authors:  Elena N Waidmann; Kenji W Koyano; Julie J Hong; Brian E Russ; David A Leopold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  The face inversion effect following pitch and yaw rotations: investigating the boundaries of holistic processing.

Authors:  Simone K Favelle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-18

7.  View specific generalisation effects in face recognition: Front and yaw comparison views are better than pitch.

Authors:  Simone Favelle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.