Literature DB >> 22127769

Association of direct-to-consumer genome-wide disease risk estimates and self-reported disease.

Cinnamon S Bloss1, Eric J Topol, Nicholas J Schork.   

Abstract

The ongoing controversy surrounding direct-to-consumer (DTC) personal genomic tests intensified last year when the U.S. Government Accountability Office released results of an undercover investigation of four companies that offer such testing. Among their findings, they reported that some of their donors received DNA-based predictions that conflicted with their actual medical histories. We aimed to more rigorously evaluate the relationship between DTC genomic risk estimates and self-reported disease by leveraging data from the Scripps Genomic Health Initiative. We prospectively collected self-reported personal and family health history data for 3,416 individuals, who went on to purchase a commercially available DTC genomic test. For 5 out of 15 total conditions studied, we found that risk estimates from the test were significantly associated with self-reported family and/or personal health history. The five conditions included Graves' disease, Type 2 Diabetes, Lupus, Alzheimer's disease, and Restless Leg Syndrome. To further investigate these findings, we ranked each of the 15 conditions based on published heritability estimates and conducted post hoc power analyses, based on the number of individuals in our sample who reported significant histories of each condition. We found that high heritability, coupled with high prevalence in our sample and thus adequate statistical power, explained the pattern of associations observed. Our study represents one of the first evaluations of the relationship between risk estimates from a commercially available DTC personal genomic test and self-reported health histories in the consumers of that test.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22127769      PMCID: PMC3338895          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  6 in total

1.  Robust replication of genotype-phenotype associations across multiple diseases in an electronic medical record.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie; Joshua C Denny; Dana C Crawford; Andrea H Ramirez; Justin B Weiner; Jill M Pulley; Melissa A Basford; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Jeffrey R Balser; Daniel R Masys; Jonathan L Haines; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Family history in public health practice: a genomic tool for disease prevention and health promotion.

Authors:  Rodolfo Valdez; Paula W Yoon; Nadeem Qureshi; Ridgely Fisk Green; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  An agenda for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Sarah S Murray; Samuel Levy; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Laura Ornowski; Elana Silver; Michele Cargill; Vance Vanier; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Genetic counseling and the ethical issues around direct to consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins; Anita Ho
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The impact of personal genomics on risk perceptions and medical decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua L Krieger; Fiona Murray; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; Tonya Nashay Sanders; Nancy S Hogan; Sara Cherny; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-07

4.  Development of a general logistic model for disease risk prediction using multiple SNPs.

Authors:  Cheng Long; Guanting Lv; Xinmiao Fu
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.693

5.  Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees.

Authors:  Natalie M Baptista; Kurt D Christensen; Deanna Alexis Carere; Simon A Broadley; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.