Literature DB >> 22127308

Communication and informed consent in elderly people.

M Giampieri1.   

Abstract

Physician-patient relationship is the key-point for an optimal management of any medical procedure. Before performing any diagnostic or therapeutic procedure, clinical communication with patients is necessary. It should regard the nature and purpose of a proposed procedure including potential risks and benefits. During physician-patient communication, alternatives, as well as the risks and benefits of not receiving or undergoing a procedure should also be disclosed. Thus, a complete physician-patient clinical communication is the basis of "shared decision-making" and plays a clinical-therapeutic role in the informed consent process in order to improve patient care. Informed consent is a delicate process of communication between a patient and physician necessary for patient authorization for any medical intervention. The success of achieving good informed consent procedure depends on the strength of the relationship between the doctor and the patient. For this reason, the traditional paternalistic relationship, in which decisions were made by the doctor, is no longer appropriate. Therefore, the use of a model which allows for a greater patient involvement in the decision making process is fundamental. This approach allows for a clearer impact on patient values. The aspects of the procedure related to these values, combined with the technical and scientific considerations of the doctor, are the basis of a shared decision making process, in which the patient is actively involved. Therefore, an informed consent is not simply the acquisition of the patient's signature, but a real process based on the dialogue between doctor and patient. This dialogue is particularly delicate in some circumstances, such as geriatric medicine and anesthesiology. Seeking consent is part of a respectful relationship with an older person. Adults are almost always considered capable of making personal healthcare decisions. Older adults should also be considered capable of handling their own healthcare where the idea that old age or frailty may inhibit ones' decisional capacity. It is essential to provide appropriate and accessible information for each individual case in order to confirm patient comprehension, especially in the presence of possible coexisting disabilities (i.e., cognitive impairment, presbyacusia, visual disturbances, etc.). The informed consent process should therefore be adapted to patient understanding linked to level of education, and personality. Cognitive impairment may limit the ability to actively participate in the process. In this context, physicians deal with three different situations on a daily basis: 1) patients with good cognitive functioning; 2) patients with various degrees of cognitive impairment; 3) patients with a legal guardian. The aim of this review was to discuss patterns of an accurate, empathetic and effective communication process that may be used during the informed consent process with a particular attention to the emerging problems in the practice of anesthesia in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22127308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amrita Mukherjee; Alicia A Livinski; Joseph Millum; Steffany Chamut; Shahdokht Boroumand; Timothy J Iafolla; Margo R Adesanya; Bruce A Dye
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 2.  How much information do patients want or need.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Givel; Benedikt Meier
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Postoperative Delirium Prevention.

Authors:  Christopher G Hughes; Christina S Boncyk; Deborah J Culley; Lee A Fleisher; Jacqueline M Leung; David L McDonagh; Tong J Gan; Matthew D McEvoy; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  An audit of consenting practices in a district general hospital. Can we improve?

Authors:  E Chohda; S Doddi; S Sundaramoorthy; R N Manton; A Ahad; A Sinha; H Khawaja
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

5.  Readability of informed consent forms in clinical trials conducted in a skin research center.

Authors:  Aniseh Samadi; Fariba Asghari
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2016-07-03

6.  Informed consent in dentistry and medicine in Spain: Practical considerations and legality.

Authors:  M Otero; N Oishi; F Martínez; M-T Ballester; J Basterra
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-05-01

7.  Advances and Innovations in Ablative Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Using Mixed Reality Technologies in Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nadia Karnatz; Henriette L Möllmann; Max Wilkat; Aida Parviz; Majeed Rana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Impact of informed consent content and length on recruitment of older adults into a community based primary prevention trial.

Authors:  Fleur O'Hare; Simone Spark; Zachary Flanagan; Stephane Heritier; Andrea Curtis; Sophia Zoungas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-06-12

9.  Perceptions of health professionals about the quality of communication and deliberation with the patient and its impact on the health decision making process.

Authors:  Eduardo Osuna; Antonio Pérez-Carrión; María D Pérez-Cárceles; Francisco Machado
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2018-12-20

Review 10.  What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review.

Authors:  Carmel Davies; Francesco Fattori; Deirdre O'Donnell; Sarah Donnelly; Éidín Ní Shé; Marie O Shea; Lucia Prihodova; Caoimhe Gleeson; Áine Flynn; Bernadette Rock; Jacqueline Grogan; Michelle O'Brien; Shane O'Hanlon; Marie Therese Cooney; Marie Tighe; Thilo Kroll
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.