Literature DB >> 22126223

Who is not adhering to physical activity referrals, and why?

Matti E Leijon1, Johan Faskunger, Preben Bendtsen, Karin Festin, Per Nilsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse patients' self-reported reasons for not adhering to physical activity referrals (PARs). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Data on 1358 patients who did not adhere to PARs were collected at 38 primary health care (PHC) centres in Sweden. INTERVENTION: PHC providers issued formal physical activity prescriptions for home-based activities or referrals for facility-based activities.
SUBJECTS: Ordinary PHC patients whom regular staff believed would benefit from increased physical activity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reasons for non-adherence to PARs: "sickness", "pain", "low motivation", "no time", "economic factors", and "other".
RESULTS: Sickness and pain were the most common motives for non-adherence among older patients. The youngest patients blamed economic factors and lack of time more frequently than those in the oldest age group. Economic factors was a more common reason for non-adherence among those referred for facility-based activities compared with those prescribed home-based activities. Low motivation was a more frequent cause of non-adherence among those prescribed home-based activities compared with those referred for facility-based activities. Furthermore, lack of time was a more common reason for non-adherence among patients issued with PARs due to high blood pressure than other patients, while low motivation was a more common reason among patients issued with PARs because of a BMI of > 25.
CONCLUSION: The reasons for non-adherence differ between patients prescribed home-based activities and referred for facility-based activities, as well as between patients with different specific characteristics. The information obtained may be valuable not only for the professionals working in PHC, but also for those who work to develop PARs for use in different contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22126223      PMCID: PMC3308466          DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2011.628238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  17 in total

Review 1.  Assessing multiple risk behaviors in primary care. Screening issues and related concepts.

Authors:  Thomas F Babor; Christopher N Sciamanna; Nicolaas P Pronk
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Approaches to increase physical activity: reviewing the evidence for exercise-referral schemes.

Authors:  O Morgan
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 3.  How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?

Authors:  Luc Vanhees; Johan Lefevre; Renaat Philippaerts; Martine Martens; Wim Huygens; Thierry Troosters; Gaston Beunen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Exercise on prescription in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jes Bak Sørensen; Thomas Skovgaard; Lis Puggaard
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Access to exercise referral schemes -- a population based analysis.

Authors:  R A Harrison; F McNair; L Dugdill
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Raina Elley; Ngaire Kerse; Bruce Arroll; Elizabeth Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

7.  Factors associated with physical activity referral uptake and participation.

Authors:  David V B James; Lynne H Johnston; Diane Crone; Adrienne H Sidford; Chris Gidlow; Clare Morris; Charlie Foster
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  Physical activity on prescription in primary health care: a follow-up of physical activity level and quality of life.

Authors:  L V Kallings; M Leijon; M-L Hellénius; A Ståhle
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  M Hillsdon; C Foster; M Thorogood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

10.  Physical activity referrals in Swedish primary health care - prescriber and patient characteristics, reasons for prescriptions, and prescribed activities.

Authors:  M E Leijon; P Bendtsen; P Nilsen; K Ekberg; A Ståhle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of pain and function after two home exercise programs in a clinical trial on women with chronic neck pain - with special emphasises on completers and responders.

Authors:  Linn Karlsson; Esa-Pekka Takala; Björn Gerdle; Britt Larsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Exercise intervention and health checks for middle-aged men with elevated cardiovascular risk: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Helena Liira; Elina Engberg; Jenni Leppävuori; Svetlana From; Hannu Kautiainen; Juha Liira; Taina Remes-Lyly; Heikki Tikkanen; Kaisu Pitkälä
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Why are standardized lifestyle interventions for the metabolic syndrome not successful? Experiences from two RCTs and one mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Hans Thulesius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 4.  Physical activity on prescription schemes (PARS): do programme characteristics influence effectiveness? Results of a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jelena Arsenijevic; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Patients with chronic pain may need extra support when prescribed physical activity in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Monica Joelsson; Susanne Bernhardsson; Maria E H Larsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Group or individual lifestyle-integrated functional exercise (LiFE)? A qualitative analysis of acceptability.

Authors:  Leah Reicherzer; Franziska Kramer-Gmeiner; Sarah Labudek; Carl-Philipp Jansen; Corinna Nerz; Malin J Nystrand; Clemens Becker; Lindy Clemson; Michael Schwenk
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Factors associated with increased physical activity among patients prescribed physical activity in Swedish routine health care including an offer of counselor support: a 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pia Andersen; Sara Holmberg; Kristofer Årestedt; Lena Lendahls; Per Nilsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Perceived reasons, incentives, and barriers to physical activity in Swedish elderly men.

Authors:  Camilla Sjörs; Stephanie E Bonn; Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Arvid Sjölander; Katarina Bälter
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2014-11-12

9.  Associations between psychological factors and the effect of home-based physical exercise in women with chronic neck and shoulder pain.

Authors:  Linn Karlsson; Björn Gerdle; Esa-Pekka Takala; Gerhard Andersson; Britt Larsson
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 10.  Financial incentives for a healthy life style and disease prevention among older people: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marzena Tambor; Milena Pavlova; Stanisława Golinowska; Jelena Arsenijevic; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.