Literature DB >> 22125167

Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage.

Michael Gluck1, Andrew Ross, Shayan Irani, Otto Lin, S Ian Gan, Mehran Fotoohi, Ellen Hauptmann, Robert Crane, Justin Siegal, David H Robinson, L W Traverso, Richard A Kozarek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) treated with dual modality endoscopic and percutaneous drainage (DMD) has been shown to decrease length of hospitalization (LOH) and use of radiological resources in comparison to standard percutaneous drainage (SPD). AIM: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that as the cohort of DMD and SPD patients expand, the original conclusions are durable.
METHODS: The database of patients receiving treatment for WOPN between January 2006 and April 2011 was analyzed retrospectively. PATIENTS: One hundred two patients with symptomatic WOPN who had no previous drainage procedures were evaluated: 49 with DMD and 46 with SPD; 7 were excluded due to a salvage procedure.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics including age, sex, etiology of pancreatitis, and severity of disease based on computed tomographic severity index were indistinguishable between the two cohorts. The DMD cohort had shorter LOH, time until removal of percutaneous drains, fewer CT scans, drain studies, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs; p < 0.05 for all). There were 12 identifiable complications during DMD, which were successfully treated without the need for surgery. The 30-day mortality in DMD was 4% (one multi-system organ failure and one out of the hospital with congestive heart failure). Three patients receiving SPD had surgery, and three (7%) died in the hospital.
CONCLUSION: DMD for symptomatic WOPN reduces LOH, radiological procedures, and number of ERCPs compared to SPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22125167     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1759-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  36 in total

1.  Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  H G Beger; M Büchler; R Bittner; W Oettinger; S Block; T Nevalainen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience.

Authors:  C R Carter; C J McKay; C W Imrie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study.

Authors:  Karen Horvath; Patrick Freeny; Jaime Escallon; Patrick Heagerty; Bryan Comstock; David J Glickerman; Eileen Bulger; Mika Sinanan; Lorrie Langdale; Orpheus Kolokythas; R Torrance Andrews
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-09

4.  Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results.

Authors:  P C Freeny; E Hauptmann; S J Althaus; L W Traverso; M Sinanan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Marc G Besselink; Olaf J Bakker; H Sijbrand Hofker; Marja A Boermeester; Cornelis H Dejong; Harry van Goor; Alexander F Schaapherder; Casper H van Eijck; Thomas L Bollen; Bert van Ramshorst; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Robin Timmer; Johan S Laméris; Philip M Kruyt; Eric R Manusama; Erwin van der Harst; George P van der Schelling; Tom Karsten; Eric J Hesselink; Cornelis J van Laarhoven; Camiel Rosman; Koop Bosscha; Ralph J de Wit; Alexander P Houdijk; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Erik Buskens; Hein G Gooszen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; P C Freeny; E vanSonnenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Laparoscopic transgastric pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  B J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy.

Authors:  S Connor; P Ghaneh; M Raraty; R Sutton; E Rosso; C J Garvey; M L Hughes; J C Evans; P Rowlands; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Timothy B Gardner; Prabhleen Chahal; Georgios I Papachristou; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Bret T Petersen; Christopher J Gostout; Mark D Topazian; Naoki Takahashi; Michael G Sarr; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Long-term follow-up of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis treated by percutaneous necrosectomy.

Authors:  E Endlicher; M Völk; S Feuerbach; J Schölmerich; A Schäffler; H Messmann
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec
View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Management of Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Larsen; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09

2.  Endotherapy for organized pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Richard Kozarek
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-02

3.  A percutaneous drainage protocol for severe and moderately severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Motokazu Sugimoto; David P Sonntag; Greggory S Flint; Cody J Boyce; John C Kirkham; Tyler J Harris; Sean M Carr; Brent D Nelson; Joshua G Barton; L William Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-Up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis: Experience of 10 Years from a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Rajesh Gupta; Aditya Kulkarni; Raghavendra Babu; Sunil Shenvi; Rahul Gupta; Gopal Sharma; Mandeep Kang; Ujjwal Gorsi; Surinder Singh Rana
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Management of (Peri)Pancreatic Collections in Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Mihailo Bezmarević; Sven M van Dijk; Rogier P Voermans; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-04-02

6.  Pancreatic endotherapy and necrosectomy.

Authors:  Rahul Pannala; Andrew S Ross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06

7.  Safety and clinical outcomes of early dual modality drainage (< 28 days) compared to later drainage of pancreatic necrotic fluid collections: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Shivanand Bomman; David Sanders; David Coy; Danielle La Selva; Quincy Pham; Troy Zehr; Joanna Law; Michael Larsen; Shayan Irani; Richard A Kozarek; Andrew Ross; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Open Pancreatic Debridement in Necrotizing Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Thomas K Maatman; Nicholas J Zyromski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collection: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seung Bae Yoon; In Seok Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  ABC's of writing medical papers in English.

Authors:  Todd H Baron
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.