PURPOSE: To define maximum tolerated dose (MTD), clinical toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered in combination with docetaxel once every 21 days in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel was administered over 1 h at doses of 55, 70, and 75 mg/m(2). 17-AAG was administered over 1-2 h, following the completion of the docetaxel infusion, at escalating doses ranging from 80 to 650 mg/m(2) in 12 patient cohorts. Serum was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies during cycle 1. Docetaxel, 17-AAG, and 17-AG levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biologic effects of 17-AAG were monitored in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by immunoblot. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients received docetaxel and 17-AAG. The most common all-cause grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia. An MTD was not defined; however, three dose-limiting toxicities were observed, including 2 incidences of neutropenic fever and 1 of junctional bradycardia. Dose escalation was halted at docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)-17-AAG 650 mg/m(2) due to delayed toxicities attributed to patient intolerance of the DMSO-based 17-AAG formulation. Of 46 evaluable patients, 1 patient with lung cancer experienced a partial response. Minor responses were observed in patients with lung, prostate, melanoma, and bladder cancers. A correlation between reduced docetaxel clearance and 17-AAG dose level was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and 17-AAG was well tolerated in adult patients with solid tumors, although patient intolerance to the DMSO formulation precluded further dose escalation. The recommended phase II dose is docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) and 17-AAG 500 mg/m(2).
PURPOSE: To define maximum tolerated dose (MTD), clinical toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered in combination with docetaxel once every 21 days in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Docetaxel was administered over 1 h at doses of 55, 70, and 75 mg/m(2). 17-AAG was administered over 1-2 h, following the completion of the docetaxel infusion, at escalating doses ranging from 80 to 650 mg/m(2) in 12 patient cohorts. Serum was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies during cycle 1. Docetaxel, 17-AAG, and 17-AG levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biologic effects of 17-AAG were monitored in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by immunoblot. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients received docetaxel and 17-AAG. The most common all-cause grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia. An MTD was not defined; however, three dose-limiting toxicities were observed, including 2 incidences of neutropenic fever and 1 of junctional bradycardia. Dose escalation was halted at docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)-17-AAG 650 mg/m(2) due to delayed toxicities attributed to patient intolerance of the DMSO-based 17-AAG formulation. Of 46 evaluable patients, 1 patient with lung cancer experienced a partial response. Minor responses were observed in patients with lung, prostate, melanoma, and bladder cancers. A correlation between reduced docetaxel clearance and 17-AAG dose level was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and 17-AAG was well tolerated in adult patients with solid tumors, although patient intolerance to the DMSO formulation precluded further dose escalation. The recommended phase II dose is docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) and 17-AAG 500 mg/m(2).
Authors: David B Solit; Fuzhong F Zheng; Maria Drobnjak; Pamela N Münster; Brian Higgins; David Verbel; Glenn Heller; William Tong; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; David B Agus; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert A Parise; Ramesh K Ramanathan; William C Zamboni; Merrill J Egorin Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2003-01-05 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Andrea D Basso; David B Solit; Gabriela Chiosis; Banabihari Giri; Philip Tsichlis; Neal Rosen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-08-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jay K Singh; Darren M Hutt; Bradley Tait; Naihsuan C Guy; Jeffrey C Sivils; Nina R Ortiz; Ashley N Payan; Shravan Kumar Komaragiri; Jazzmin Jovonna Owens; David Culbertson; Laura J Blair; Chad Dickey; Szu Yu Kuo; Dan Finley; H Jane Dyson; Marc B Cox; Jaideep Chaudhary; Jason E Gestwicki; William E Balch Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Alexandra Canonici; Zulfiqar Qadir; Neil T Conlon; Denis M Collins; Neil A O'Brien; Naomi Walsh; Alex J Eustace; Norma O'Donovan; John Crown Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Timothy A Yap; Alan D Smith; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Andrew Lilja; Clare E Weeden; Kate McArthur; Thao Nguyen; Alastair Donald; Zi Xin Wong; Lovisa Dousha; Steve Bozinovski; Ross Vlahos; Christopher J Burns; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Gary P Anderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joanna L Gillis; Luke A Selth; Margaret M Centenera; Scott L Townley; Shihua Sun; Stephen R Plymate; Wayne D Tilley; Lisa M Butler Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2013-05