OBJECTIVE: Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is both underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed. Many patients are incorrectly diagnosed as having LQTS after presenting to an emergency department (ED) with presyncope/syncope and demonstrating "borderline" QT-interval prolongation (QTc ≥ 440 milliseconds) in a sentinel ED-obtained electrocardiogram (ECG). We sought to evaluate the distribution and clinical significance of QT intervals in the ED. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for all patients 22 years of age or younger (N = 626; 369 females; age, mean ± SD: 17 ± 5 years) who had ECGs obtained in our ED between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008. A total of 223 patients were excluded because of known structural heart disease, arrhythmias, electrolyte abnormalities, or exposure to QT-interval-prolonging medications. RESULTS: The average QTc was 428 ± 28 milliseconds (range: 344-566 milliseconds), and approximately one-third of patients had QTc values of ≥440 milliseconds (females: 41%; males: 21%). Overall, 104 patients presented with presyncope/syncope, of whom 14 (13%) had follow-up ECGs. On follow-up, these patients demonstrated significant decreases in QTc values of 33 ± 43 milliseconds (P < .04). Only 8 (31%) of 26 patients with presyncope/syncope with borderline QT values had follow-up ECGs performed, in 5 of which the QTc values were decreased significantly. No patients ultimately received LQTS diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: In the ED setting, approximately one-third of pediatric patients exhibited QTc values of ≥440 milliseconds and had significant normalization of QTc values in follow-up evaluations. First-time ECGs obtained after a syncopal episode must be interpreted with caution, particularly in the context of so-called borderline QT intervals.
OBJECTIVE:Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is both underdiagnosed and overdiagnosed. Many patients are incorrectly diagnosed as having LQTS after presenting to an emergency department (ED) with presyncope/syncope and demonstrating "borderline" QT-interval prolongation (QTc ≥ 440 milliseconds) in a sentinel ED-obtained electrocardiogram (ECG). We sought to evaluate the distribution and clinical significance of QT intervals in the ED. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for all patients 22 years of age or younger (N = 626; 369 females; age, mean ± SD: 17 ± 5 years) who had ECGs obtained in our ED between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008. A total of 223 patients were excluded because of known structural heart disease, arrhythmias, electrolyte abnormalities, or exposure to QT-interval-prolonging medications. RESULTS: The average QTc was 428 ± 28 milliseconds (range: 344-566 milliseconds), and approximately one-third of patients had QTc values of ≥440 milliseconds (females: 41%; males: 21%). Overall, 104 patients presented with presyncope/syncope, of whom 14 (13%) had follow-up ECGs. On follow-up, these patients demonstrated significant decreases in QTc values of 33 ± 43 milliseconds (P < .04). Only 8 (31%) of 26 patients with presyncope/syncope with borderline QT values had follow-up ECGs performed, in 5 of which the QTc values were decreased significantly. No patients ultimately received LQTS diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: In the ED setting, approximately one-third of pediatric patients exhibited QTc values of ≥440 milliseconds and had significant normalization of QTc values in follow-up evaluations. First-time ECGs obtained after a syncopal episode must be interpreted with caution, particularly in the context of so-called borderline QT intervals.
Authors: Heather N Anderson; J Martijn Bos; Kristina H Haugaa; Bruce W Morlan; Robert F Tarrell; Pedro J Caraballo; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: B R Moore; J M Benjamin; S Salman; S Griffin; E Ginny; M Page-Sharp; L J Robinson; P Siba; K T Batty; I Mueller; T M E Davis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jane Crosson; Siddharth Srivastava; Genila M Bibat; Siddharth Gupta; Aditi Kantipuly; Constance Smith-Hicks; Scott M Myers; Abanti Sanyal; Gayane Yenokyan; Joel Brenner; Sakkubai R Naidu Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Travis S Heath; Rachel G Greenberg; Susan R Hupp; David A Turner; Christoph P Hornik; Kanecia O Zimmerman Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018 Mar-Apr
Authors: John Benjamin; Brioni Moore; Sook Ting Lee; Michèle Senn; Susan Griffin; Dulci Lautu; Sam Salman; Peter Siba; Ivo Mueller; Timothy M E Davis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Moses Laman; Brioni R Moore; John M Benjamin; Gumul Yadi; Cathy Bona; Jonathan Warrel; Johanna H Kattenberg; Tamarah Koleala; Laurens Manning; Bernadine Kasian; Leanne J Robinson; Naomi Sambale; Lina Lorry; Stephan Karl; Wendy A Davis; Anna Rosanas-Urgell; Ivo Mueller; Peter M Siba; Inoni Betuela; Timothy M E Davis Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Loes de Veld; Nico van der Lely; Ben J M Hermans; Joris J van Hoof; Lichelle Wong; Arja Suzanne Vink Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 3.860