INTRODUCTION: The G-protein coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, widely expressed in the CNS, have been implicated in fragile X syndrome (FXS). Recent studies have reported an overactive signaling through the muscarinic receptors in the Fmr1KO mouse model. Hence, it was hypothesized that reducing muscarinic signaling might modulate behavioral phenotypes in the Fmr1KO mice. Pharmacological studies from our lab have provided evidence for this hypothesis, with subtype-preferring muscarinic M1 and M4 receptor antagonists modulating select behaviors in the Fmr1KO mice. Since the pharmacological antagonists were not highly specific, we investigated the specific role of M4 receptors in the Fmr1KO mouse model, using a genetic approach. METHODS: We created a double mutant heterozygous for the M4 receptor gene and hemizygous for the Fmr1 gene and examined the mutants on various behaviors. Each animal was tested on a behavior battery comprising of open-field activity (activity), light-dark (anxiety), marble burying (perseverative behavior), prepulse inhibition (sensorimotor gating), rotarod (motor coordination), passive avoidance (learning and memory) and hotplate (analgesia). Animals were also tested on the audiogenic seizure protocol and testis weights were measured. RESULTS: Reduction of M4 receptor expression in the heterozygotes completely rescued the analgesic response and partly rescued the acoustic startle response phenotype in the Fmr1KO mice. However, no modulation was observed in a number of behaviors including learning and memory, activity, perseverative behavior and audiogenic seizures. CONCLUSION: Reducing M4 receptor signaling altered only select behavioral phenotypes in the Fmr1KO mouse model, suggesting that other targets are involved in the modulation of fragile X behaviors.
INTRODUCTION: The G-protein coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, widely expressed in the CNS, have been implicated in fragile X syndrome (FXS). Recent studies have reported an overactive signaling through the muscarinic receptors in the Fmr1KO mouse model. Hence, it was hypothesized that reducing muscarinic signaling might modulate behavioral phenotypes in the Fmr1KO mice. Pharmacological studies from our lab have provided evidence for this hypothesis, with subtype-preferring muscarinic M1 and M4 receptor antagonists modulating select behaviors in the Fmr1KO mice. Since the pharmacological antagonists were not highly specific, we investigated the specific role of M4 receptors in the Fmr1KO mouse model, using a genetic approach. METHODS: We created a double mutant heterozygous for the M4 receptor gene and hemizygous for the Fmr1 gene and examined the mutants on various behaviors. Each animal was tested on a behavior battery comprising of open-field activity (activity), light-dark (anxiety), marble burying (perseverative behavior), prepulse inhibition (sensorimotor gating), rotarod (motor coordination), passive avoidance (learning and memory) and hotplate (analgesia). Animals were also tested on the audiogenic seizure protocol and testis weights were measured. RESULTS: Reduction of M4 receptor expression in the heterozygotes completely rescued the analgesic response and partly rescued the acoustic startle response phenotype in the Fmr1KO mice. However, no modulation was observed in a number of behaviors including learning and memory, activity, perseverative behavior and audiogenic seizures. CONCLUSION: Reducing M4 receptor signaling altered only select behavioral phenotypes in the Fmr1KO mouse model, suggesting that other targets are involved in the modulation of fragile X behaviors.
Authors: Morgane Thomsen; Jürgen Wess; Brian S Fulton; Anders Fink-Jensen; S Barak Caine Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Hansen Wang; Long-Jun Wu; Susan S Kim; Frank J S Lee; Bo Gong; Hiroki Toyoda; Ming Ren; Yu-Ze Shang; Hui Xu; Fang Liu; Ming-Gao Zhao; Min Zhuo Journal: Neuron Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Corinne M Spencer; Deanna F Graham; Lisa A Yuva-Paylor; David L Nelson; Richard Paylor Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Li Wang; Luis E F Almeida; Margaret Nettleton; Alfia Khaibullina; Sarah Albani; Sayuri Kamimura; Mehdi Nouraie; Zenaide M N Quezado Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Richard Delorme; Elodie Ey; Roberto Toro; Marion Leboyer; Christopher Gillberg; Thomas Bourgeron Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Risa Kashima; Patrick L Redmond; Prajakta Ghatpande; Sougata Roy; Thomas B Kornberg; Thomas Hanke; Stefan Knapp; Giorgio Lagna; Akiko Hata Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: A J Renoux; K J Sala-Hamrick; N M Carducci; M Frazer; K E Halsey; M A Sutton; D F Dolan; G G Murphy; P K Todd Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 3.332