OBJECTIVES: Depression in older adults is often undertreated due, in part, to medication costs. We examined the impact of improved prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D on use of antidepressants, medication choice, and adherence. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational claims-based study of older adults with depression (ICD-9: 296.2, 296.3, 311, 300.4) continuously enrolled in a Medicare managed care plan between 2004 and 2007. Three groups with limited ($150 or $350 quarterly caps) or no drug coverage in 2004-2005 obtained Part D benefits in 2006. A comparison group had stable employer-sponsored coverage throughout. MEASUREMENTS: Any antidepressant prescription fill, antidepressant choice (tricyclics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors versus newer antidepressants), and adherence (80% of days covered) in the first 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: : Part D was associated with increased odds of any antidepressant use among those who previously lacked coverage (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.85) but odds of use did not change among those with limited prior coverage. Use of older antidepressant agents did not change with Part D. All three groups whose coverage improved with Part D had significantly higher odds of 80% of days covered with an antidepressant (OR = 1.86 [95% CI: 1.44-2.39] for no coverage, 1.74 [95% CI: 1.25%3.42] for $150 cap; and 1.19 [95% CI: 1.06-1.34] for the $350 cap groups). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare Part D was associated with improvements in antidepressant use and adherence in depressed older adults who previously had no or limited drug coverage but not with changes in use of older agents. use and adherence in depressed older adults who previously had no or limited drug coverage but not with changes in use of older agents.
OBJECTIVES:Depression in older adults is often undertreated due, in part, to medication costs. We examined the impact of improved prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D on use of antidepressants, medication choice, and adherence. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational claims-based study of older adults with depression (ICD-9: 296.2, 296.3, 311, 300.4) continuously enrolled in a Medicare managed care plan between 2004 and 2007. Three groups with limited ($150 or $350 quarterly caps) or no drug coverage in 2004-2005 obtained Part D benefits in 2006. A comparison group had stable employer-sponsored coverage throughout. MEASUREMENTS: Any antidepressant prescription fill, antidepressant choice (tricyclics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors versus newer antidepressants), and adherence (80% of days covered) in the first 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: : Part D was associated with increased odds of any antidepressant use among those who previously lacked coverage (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.85) but odds of use did not change among those with limited prior coverage. Use of older antidepressant agents did not change with Part D. All three groups whose coverage improved with Part D had significantly higher odds of 80% of days covered with an antidepressant (OR = 1.86 [95% CI: 1.44-2.39] for no coverage, 1.74 [95% CI: 1.25%3.42] for $150 cap; and 1.19 [95% CI: 1.06-1.34] for the $350 cap groups). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare Part D was associated with improvements in antidepressant use and adherence in depressed older adults who previously had no or limited drug coverage but not with changes in use of older agents. use and adherence in depressed older adults who previously had no or limited drug coverage but not with changes in use of older agents.
Authors: Philip S Wang; Sebastian Schneeweiss; M Alan Brookhart; Robert J Glynn; Helen Mogun; Amanda R Patrick; Jerry Avorn Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Joseph J Gallo; Hillary R Bogner; Knashawn H Morales; Edward P Post; Thomas Ten Have; Martha L Bruce Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Yuting Zhang; Julie M Donohue; Judith R Lave; Gerald O'Donnell; Joseph P Newhouse Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Thomas R Ten Have; Charles F Reynolds; Ira I Katz; Herbert C Schulberg; Benoit H Mulsant; Gregory K Brown; Gail J McAvay; Jane L Pearson; George S Alexopoulos Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Jose J Escarce; Jennifer E Pace; Matthew D Solomon; Marianne Laouri; Pamela B Landsman; Steven M Teutsch Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wesley Yin; Anirban Basu; James X Zhang; Atonu Rabbani; David O Meltzer; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2004
Authors: Donovan T Maust; Frederic C Blow; Ilse R Wiechers; Helen C Kales; Steven C Marcus Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Aaron S Kesselheim; Krista F Huybrechts; Niteesh K Choudhry; Lisa A Fulchino; Danielle L Isaman; Mary K Kowal; Troyen A Brennan Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joseph T Hanlon; Robert M Boudreau; Subashan Perera; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ronald I Shorr; Douglas C Bauer; Julie M Donohue Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Naomi C Sacks; James F Burgess; Howard J Cabral; Steven D Pizer; Marie E McDonnell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 5.128