OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess healthy eating policies at national level which have been evaluated in terms of their impact on awareness of healthy eating, food consumption, health outcome or cost/benefit. DESIGN: Review of policy documents and their evaluations when available. SETTING: European Member States. SUBJECTS: One hundred and twenty-one policy documents revised, 107 retained. RESULTS: Of the 107 selected interventions, twenty-two had been evaluated for their impact on awareness or knowledge and twenty-seven for their impact on consumption. Furthermore sixteen interventions provided an evaluation of health impact, while three actions specifically measured any cost/benefit ratio. The indicators used in these evaluations were in most cases not comparable. Evaluation was more often found for public information campaigns, regulation of meals at schools/canteens and nutrition education programmes. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need not only to develop harmonized and verifiable procedures but also indicators for measuring effectiveness and success and for comparing between interventions and countries. EU policies are recommended to provide a set of indicators that may be measured consistently and regularly in all countries. Furthermore, public information campaigns should be accompanied by other interventions, as evaluations may show an impact on awareness and intention, but rarely on consumption patterns and health outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess healthy eating policies at national level which have been evaluated in terms of their impact on awareness of healthy eating, food consumption, health outcome or cost/benefit. DESIGN: Review of policy documents and their evaluations when available. SETTING: European Member States. SUBJECTS: One hundred and twenty-one policy documents revised, 107 retained. RESULTS: Of the 107 selected interventions, twenty-two had been evaluated for their impact on awareness or knowledge and twenty-seven for their impact on consumption. Furthermore sixteen interventions provided an evaluation of health impact, while three actions specifically measured any cost/benefit ratio. The indicators used in these evaluations were in most cases not comparable. Evaluation was more often found for public information campaigns, regulation of meals at schools/canteens and nutrition education programmes. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need not only to develop harmonized and verifiable procedures but also indicators for measuring effectiveness and success and for comparing between interventions and countries. EU policies are recommended to provide a set of indicators that may be measured consistently and regularly in all countries. Furthermore, public information campaigns should be accompanied by other interventions, as evaluations may show an impact on awareness and intention, but rarely on consumption patterns and health outcome.
Authors: Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Helen Bromley; Lois Orton; Corinna Hawkes; David Taylor-Robinson; Martin O'Flaherty; Rory McGill; Elspeth Anwar; Lirije Hyseni; May Moonan; Mike Rayner; Simon Capewell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Patricia Jane Lucas; Emma Patterson; Gary Sacks; Natassja Billich; Charlotte Elizabeth Louise Evans Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: L Hyseni; M Atkinson; H Bromley; L Orton; F Lloyd-Williams; R McGill; S Capewell Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 4.016