Literature DB >> 22123019

Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.

Shin Takeshita1, Manabu Kanazawa, Shunsuke Minakuchi.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of different overdenture attachment systems on the stress generated in peri-implant bone during overdenture dislodgement and loading. Two implants were placed in the canine regions on an acrylic edentulous mandibular model. Four strain gauges were attached to the resin surface adjacent to the left implant. Bar, ball, and magnetic attachments were examined. Three experimental overdentures were fabricated, and the denture parts of the attachment systems were incorporated into the mucosal surface. Retentive forces and strains generated in peri-implant bone during three types of dislodgement (vertical, anterior and posterior) and loading (left first molar region, right first molar region and mid-anterior region) were measured. The bar attachment showed the highest retentive force and reduced strain on posterior dislodgement. The ball attachment demonstrated the largest strain on loading at molar regions. The magnetic attachment showed the smallest retentive force and little strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22123019     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2011-134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  9 in total

1.  Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): the search for the ideal protocol. A literature review.

Authors:  Domenica Laurito; Luca Lamazza; Michael J Spink; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-05-03

2.  Implant-supported overdenture with prefabricated bar attachment system in mandibular edentulous patient.

Authors:  Seung-Ryong Ha; Sung-Hun Kim; Seung-Il Song; Seong-Tae Hong; Gy-Young Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdentures retained with one, two, or four ball attachments: A finite element study.

Authors:  Mohamed M El-Zawahry; Eman M Ibraheem; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Sahar A Ghorab; Mohamed I El-Anwar
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

5.  Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models.

Authors:  So-Yeon Song; Kyeong-Hwan Kang; Jeong-Yol Lee; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  A Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Implant-Retained Overdenture Based on Precision Attachment Type.

Authors:  Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa; Agnieszka A Pilarska; Wiesław Hędzelek; Piotr Boniecki; Krzysztof Pilarski; Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Strains around distally inclined implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Moustafa Abdou Elsyad; Fathi Abo Setta; Ahmed Samir Khirallah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  In vitro retention capacity of two overdenture attachment systems: Locator® and Equator®.

Authors:  Nieves Mínguez-Tomás; Jorge Alonso-Pérez-Barquero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; Ángel Vicente-Escuder; Eduardo J Selva-Otaolaurruchi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-07-01

9.  FEM Analysis Applied to OT Bridge Abutment with Seeger Retention System.

Authors:  Gabriele Cervino; Marco Cicciù; Simone Fedi; Dario Milone; Luca Fiorillo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-08-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.