Literature DB >> 2212288

Perception of intraphonemic differences by phoneticians, musicians, and inexperienced listeners.

J Hillenbrand1, G J Canter, B L Smith.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown that extensive training with synthetic speech sounds can result in substantial improvements in listeners' perception of intraphonemic differences. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of listening experience on the perception of intraphonemic differences in the absence of specific training with the synthetic speech sounds being tested. Phonetically trained listeners, musicians, and untrained listeners were tested on a two-choice identification task, a three-choice identification task, and an ABX discrimination task using a synthetic [bi]-[phi] continuum and a synthetic [wei]-[rei] continuum. The three-choice identification task included the identification of stimuli with an "indefinite" or "ambiguous" quality in addition to clear instances of the opposing phonetic categories. Results included: (1) All three subject groups showed some ability to identify ambiguous stimuli; (2) phonetically trained listeners were better at identifying ambiguous stimuli than musicians and untrained listeners; (3) phonetically trained listeners performed better on the discrimination task than musicians and untrained listeners; (4) musicians and untrained listeners did not differ on any of the listening tasks; and (5) participation by the inexperienced listeners in a 10-week introductory phonetics course did not result in improvements in either the three-choice identification task or the discrimination task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212288     DOI: 10.1121/1.399768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  3 in total

1.  Phonetics exercises using the Alvin experiment-control software.

Authors:  James M Hillenbrand; Robert T Gayvert; Michael J Clark
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians.

Authors:  Cyrill Guy Martin Ott; Nicolas Langer; Matthias S Oechslin; Martin Meyer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-06

3.  Differences in mismatch responses to vowels and musical intervals: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Elika Bergelson; Michael Shvartsman; William J Idsardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.