Literature DB >> 2212253

Selective positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac function in dogs.

O J Veddeng1, E S Hysing, O A Smiseth.   

Abstract

Effects of general (G) versus selective (S) right (R) and left (L) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were compared during differential lung ventilation in 11 anaesthetized dogs in the supine position. GPEEP 20 cmH2O decreased cardiac output (1 min-1) from 2.9 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SE) to 1.7 +/- 0.5 (p less than 0.05), RPEEP from 2.8 +/- 0.2 to 2.2 +/- 0.2 (p less than 0.05) while LPEEP caused no significant change in cardiac output. GPEEP increased pleural pressure more than SPEEP. Pleural pressure was asymmetric during SPEEP. Both SPEEP and GPEEP increased pericardial pressure uniformly, but the increase was less marked with SPEEP. During GPEEP 20 cmH2O transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) decreased markedly. SPEEP caused less marked reductions in transmural LVEDP. Qualitatively similar, but less marked changes were observed with PEEP 10 cmH2O. In conclusion, cardiac output decreased less with selective PEEP than with general PEEP. This was explained by less increase in pleural and pericardial pressure, and accordingly less decrease in LV transmural filling pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212253     DOI: 10.1007/bf01706353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  19 in total

1.  MECHANISM OF DECREASE IN CARDIAC OUTPUT CAUSED BY OPENING THE CHEST.

Authors:  J D FERMOSO; T Q RICHARDSON; A C GUYTON
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1964-11

2.  Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J R Jansen; A Versprille
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Lung and chest wall mechanics during differential ventilation with selective PEEP.

Authors:  C Klingstedt; S Baehrendtz; L Bindslev; G Hedenstierna
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Assessment of pericardial constraint in dogs.

Authors:  O A Smiseth; M A Frais; I Kingma; E R Smith; J V Tyberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Ventilation and perfusion of each lung during differential ventilation with selective PEEP.

Authors:  G Hedenstierna; S Baehrendtz; C Klingstedt; J Santesson; B Söderborg; M Dahlborn; L Bindslev
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Dimensional analysis of the left ventricle during PEEP: relative septal and lateral wall displacements.

Authors:  S S Cassidy; M Ramanathan
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-06

7.  Mechanical effect of lung distention with positive pressure on cardiac function.

Authors:  J J Marini; B H Culver; J Butler
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1981-10

8.  The effects of airway pressure on cardiac function in intact dogs and man.

Authors:  J S Rankin; C O Olsen; C E Arentzen; G S Tyson; G Maier; P K Smith; J W Hammon; J W Davis; P A McHale; R W Anderson; D C Sabiston
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Differential ventilation in acute bilateral lung disease. Influence on gas exchange and central haemodynamics.

Authors:  S Baehrendtz; J Santesson; L Bindslev; G Hedenstierna; G Matell
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on canine ventricular function curves.

Authors:  J J Marini; B H Culver; J Butler
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Haemodynamic effects of selective positive end-expiratory pressure after unilateral pulmonary hydrochloric acid-aspiration in dogs.

Authors:  O J Veddeng; E S Myhre; C Risøe; O A Smiseth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.