BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: β-Adrenoceptors are expressed in human and experimental animal breast cancer cells. However, the effect of the agonists and antagonists reported on cell proliferation and tumour growth was paradoxical, precluding their utilization as possible adjuvant therapy, mainly in the cases of refractory tumours. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: β-Adrenoceptor expression was analysed by immunofluorescence and RT-PCR. Cell proliferation was assessed by [(3) H]-thymidine incorporation, tumour growth by measuring with a calliper and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation by Western blotting. KEY RESULTS: β(2) -Adrenoceptor expression was confirmed in the mouse and human cells tested. Cell proliferation was increased by adrenaline (by α(2) -adrenoceptor action) and decreased in every tested cell line by the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoprenaline and the β(2) -adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol. Isoprenaline and salbutamol reduced tumour growth in every tumour tested (mouse C4-HD and CC4-3-HI and human IBH-4, IBH-6 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines growing as xenografts in nude mice). These effects were reversed by the β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol. The α(2) -adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine and the β(2) -adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol were equally effective in diminishing tumour growth. ERK 1/2 activation analysed in IBH-4 tumours correlated with tumour growth, with the β-adrenoceptor agonists decreasing its activation. Inhibition of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in vitro was mainly mediated by the PKA pathway. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In our experimental models, the β-adrenoceptor agonists inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth, probably mediated by inhibition of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. The β-adrenoceptor agonists were as effective as the α(2) -adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine, providing possible novel adjuvant treatments for breast cancer.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: β-Adrenoceptors are expressed in human and experimental animal breast cancer cells. However, the effect of the agonists and antagonists reported on cell proliferation and tumour growth was paradoxical, precluding their utilization as possible adjuvant therapy, mainly in the cases of refractory tumours. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: β-Adrenoceptor expression was analysed by immunofluorescence and RT-PCR. Cell proliferation was assessed by [(3) H]-thymidine incorporation, tumour growth by measuring with a calliper and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation by Western blotting. KEY RESULTS: β(2) -Adrenoceptor expression was confirmed in the mouse and human cells tested. Cell proliferation was increased by adrenaline (by α(2) -adrenoceptor action) and decreased in every tested cell line by the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoprenaline and the β(2) -adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol. Isoprenaline and salbutamol reduced tumour growth in every tumour tested (mouse C4-HD and CC4-3-HI and humanIBH-4, IBH-6 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines growing as xenografts in nude mice). These effects were reversed by the β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol. The α(2) -adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine and the β(2) -adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol were equally effective in diminishing tumour growth. ERK 1/2 activation analysed in IBH-4 tumours correlated with tumour growth, with the β-adrenoceptor agonists decreasing its activation. Inhibition of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in vitro was mainly mediated by the PKA pathway. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In our experimental models, the β-adrenoceptor agonists inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth, probably mediated by inhibition of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. The β-adrenoceptor agonists were as effective as the α(2) -adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine, providing possible novel adjuvant treatments for breast cancer.
Authors: P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Helen Pui Shan Wong; Le Yu; Emily Kai Yee Lam; Emily Kin Ki Tai; William Ka Kei Wu; Chi-Hin Cho Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2007-03-16 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Sébastien Granier; Samuel Kim; Aaron M Shafer; Venkata R P Ratnala; Juan José Fung; Richard N Zare; Brian Kobilka Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-03-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Desmond G Powe; Melanie J Voss; Kurt S Zänker; Hany O Habashy; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Frank Entschladen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2010-11
Authors: Artur Wnorowski; Justyna Such; Rajib K Paul; Robert P Wersto; Fred E Indig; Krzysztof Jozwiak; Michel Bernier; Irving W Wainer Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Karina E Hew; Philip C Miller; Dorraya El-Ashry; Jun Sun; Alexandra H Besser; Tan A Ince; Mengnan Gu; Zhi Wei; Gao Zhang; Patricia Brafford; Wei Gao; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Joyce M Slingerland; Fiona Simpkins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marisa Coelho; Cátia Soares-Silva; Daniela Brandão; Franca Marino; Marco Cosentino; Laura Ribeiro Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Kang Le; Wendy K Steagall; Mario Stylianou; Gustavo Pacheco-Rodriguez; Thomas N Darling; Martha Vaughan; Joel Moss Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bernhard W Renz; Ryota Takahashi; Takayuki Tanaka; Marina Macchini; Yoku Hayakawa; Zahra Dantes; H Carlo Maurer; Xiaowei Chen; Zhengyu Jiang; C Benedikt Westphalen; Matthias Ilmer; Giovanni Valenti; Sarajo K Mohanta; Andreas J R Habenicht; Moritz Middelhoff; Timothy Chu; Karan Nagar; Yagnesh Tailor; Riccardo Casadei; Mariacristina Di Marco; Axel Kleespies; Richard A Friedman; Helen Remotti; Maximilian Reichert; Daniel L Worthley; Jens Neumann; Jens Werner; Alina C Iuga; Kenneth P Olive; Timothy C Wang Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 31.743