Literature DB >> 22122114

A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories.

Olivier Houix1, Guillaume Lemaitre, Nicolas Misdariis, Patrick Susini, Isabel Urdapilleta.   

Abstract

In this article we report on listener categorization of meaningful environmental sounds. A starting point for this study was the phenomenological taxonomy proposed by Gaver (1993b). In the first experimental study, 15 participants classified 60 environmental sounds and indicated the properties shared by the sounds in each class. In a second experimental study, 30 participants classified and described 56 sounds exclusively made by solid objects. The participants were required to concentrate on the actions causing the sounds independent of the sound source. The classifications were analyzed with a specific hierarchical cluster technique that accounted for possible cross-classifications, and the verbalizations were submitted to statistical lexical analyses. The results of the first study highlighted 4 main categories of sounds: solids, liquids, gases, and machines. The results of the second study indicated a distinction between discrete interactions (e.g., impacts) and continuous interactions (e.g., tearing) and suggested that actions and objects were not independent organizational principles. We propose a general structure of environmental sound categorization based on the sounds' temporal patterning, which has practical implications for the automatic classification of environmental sounds. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22122114     DOI: 10.1037/a0026240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  9 in total

1.  Evidence for a basic level in a taxonomy of everyday action sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Laurie M Heller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Julia Reh; Gerd Schmitz; Tong-Hun Hwang; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Aaron C Moberly; Valeriy Shafiro; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Perception of everyday sounds: a developmental study of a free sorting task.

Authors:  Aurore Berland; Pascal Gaillard; Michèle Guidetti; Pascal Barone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Olivier Houix; Frédéric Voisin; Nicolas Misdariis; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rising tones and rustling noises: Metaphors in gestural depictions of sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Hugo Scurto; Jules Françoise; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Olivier Houix; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Egocentric Nature of Action-Sound Associations.

Authors:  Nicole Navolio; Guillaume Lemaitre; Alain Forget; Laurie M Heller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-23

8.  Development of the multisensory perception of water in infancy.

Authors:  Yuta Ujiie; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Sound Categories: Category Formation and Evidence-Based Taxonomies.

Authors:  Oliver Bones; Trevor J Cox; William J Davies
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.