Literature DB >> 22122074

Allospecific CD154 + T-cytotoxic memory cells as potential surrogate for rejection risk in pediatric intestine transplantation.

Rakesh Sindhi1, Chethan Ashokkumar, Brandon W Higgs, P B Gilbert, Qing Sun, Sarangarajan Ranganathan, Ron Jaffe, Sara Snyder, Mylarappa Ningappa, Kyle A Soltys, Geoffrey J Bond, George V Mazariegos, Kareem Abu-Elmagd, Adriana Zeevi.   

Abstract

Clinical end-points dictate large trial enrollments and exclude children with the rare intestine transplant procedure (ITx), who experience higher drug-related morbidity. We evaluate the novel rejection-risk parameter, allo-(antigen)-specific CD154 + TcMs (i) as surrogates for ACR using Prentice's criteria, (ii) for association with immunosuppression targets to determine Fleming's surrogate end-point designation, and (iii) as time-to-event end-point in a simulated comparison of alemtuzumab (NCT#01208337, n = 14) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (rATG, n = 16) among 30 children with ITx. CD154 + TcM were measured in MLR before, and at 1-60 and 61-200 days after ITx (NCT#01163578). CD154 + TcM correlate significantly with rejection severity (Spearman r = 0.685, p = 2.03E-5) and associate with biopsy-proven ITx rejection with sensitivity/specificity of 94%/84% [corrected] independent of immunosuppressant. Previously stated sensitivity of 90% is incorrect. [corrected]. The rejection-risk threshold of CD154 + TcM resolves rapidly in 200-day follow-up (46 ± 20 vs. 158 ± 59 days, p = 0.009, K-M) with alemtuzumab, which demonstrates lower 90-day ACR incidence (50% vs. 69%, p=NS, Fisher's exact), and is associated with accelerated prednisone minimization to ≤2.5 mg/day, compared with rATG (120 ± 28 vs. 180 ± 30 days, p = 0.027, K-M). As a surrogate end-point, time-to-rejection-risk resolution measured with CD154 + TcM portends 50% reduction in sample sizes in a simulated trial of alemtuzumab vs. rATG. Rejection-risk assessment with CD154 + TcM may enable informed immunosuppression minimization, and preliminary efficacy comparisons in pediatric ITx.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22122074     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  9 in total

Review 1.  The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation.

Authors:  Kareem Abu-Elmagd
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials.

Authors:  K Behnam Sani; B Sawitzki
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Predicting Cellular Rejection With a Cell-Based Assay: Preclinical Evaluation in Children.

Authors:  Chethan Ashokkumar; Kyle Soltys; George Mazariegos; Geoffrey Bond; Brandon W Higgs; Mylarappa Ningappa; Qing Sun; Amanda Brown; Jaimie White; Samantha Levy; Tamara Fazzolare; Lisa Remaley; Katie Dirling; Patricia Harris; Tara Hartle; Pamela Kachmar; Megan Nicely; Lindsay OʼToole; Brittany Boehm; Nicole Jativa; Paula Stanley; Ronald Jaffe; Sarangarajan Ranganathan; Adriana Zeevi; Rakesh Sindhi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Profile of the Pleximmune blood test for transplant rejection risk prediction.

Authors:  Rakesh Sindhi; Chethan Ashokkumar; Brandon W Higgs; Samantha Levy; Kyle Soltys; Geoffrey Bond; George Mazariegos; Sarangarajan Ranganathan; Adriana Zeevi
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Characterization of T cell immunophenotypes in intestinal transplantation: A pilot study.

Authors:  Marjorie-Anne R Guerra; Maura Rossetti; Zhenyu Zhang; Xinkai Zhou; Emily C Whang; Robert S Venick; Elizabeth A Marcus; Suzanne V McDiarmid; Douglas G Farmer; Elaine F Reed; Laura J Wozniak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.708

6.  Operational tolerance in intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  Alexander Kroemer; Khalid Khan; Stuart S Kaufman; Jiman Kang; Joshua Weiner; Anju Duttargi; Leonid Belyayev; Chethan Ashokkumar; Rakesh Sindhi; Olga A Timofeeva; Michael Zasloff; Cal S Matsumoto; Thomas M Fishbein
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Alloreactive CD154-expressing T-cell subsets with differential sensitivity to the immunosuppressant, belatacept: potential targets of novel belatacept-based regimens.

Authors:  Chethan Ashokkumar; Bishu Ganguly; Robert Townsend; Jaimie White; Samantha Levy; Michael Moritz; George Mazariegos; Qing Sun; Rakesh Sindhi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Long-Term Signs of T Cell and Myeloid Cell Activation After Intestinal Transplantation With Cellular Rejections Contributing to Further Increase of CD16+ Cell Subsets.

Authors:  Nadja Stobutzki; Stephan Schlickeiser; Mathias Streitz; Katarina Stanko; Kim-Long Truong; Levent Akyuez; Katrin Vogt; Christine Appelt; Andreas Pascher; Olga Blau; Undine A Gerlach; Birgit Sawitzki
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Applicability, safety, and biological activity of regulatory T cell therapy in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Alberto Sánchez-Fueyo; Gavin Whitehouse; Nathali Grageda; Matthew E Cramp; Tiong Y Lim; Marco Romano; Sarah Thirkell; Katie Lowe; Laura Fry; Julie Heward; Alex Kerr; Jakia Ali; Chris Fisher; Gillian Lewis; Andrew Hope; Elisavet Kodela; Mike Lyne; Farzin Farzaneh; Shahram Kordasti; Irene Rebollo-Mesa; Juan Jose Lozano; Niloufar Safinia; Nigel Heaton; Robert Lechler; Marc Martínez-Llordella; Giovanna Lombardi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.