Literature DB >> 22122061

Time-sharing in rats: effect of distracter intensity and discriminability.

Catalin V Buhusi1.   

Abstract

Interruptions (gaps) and unfamiliar events (distracters) during a timed signal delay the timed response of humans and other animals. To explore this phenomenon, we manipulate the intensity of auditory distracters (Experiment 1), and we dissociate the role of distracter intensity, distracter similarity with the intertrial interval, and dissimilarity from the timed auditory signal (Experiment 2). When the intertrial interval and the timed signal were silent, the delay in response after an auditory distracter increased with its intensity: Rats ignored (ran through) a 40-dB distracter, stopped timing during a 75-dB distracter, and reset after a 100-dB distracter. However, when timing was signaled by a 70-dB noise, rats reset both for 40- and 100-dB distracters, stopped for both 55- and 85-dB distracters, and run for the 70-dB distracter. Data are accounted for by a time-sharing model assuming 2 concurrent processes-time accumulation and memory decay controlled by the discriminability of the interrupting event-whose interplay results in a continuum of responses, from run to reset. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22122061      PMCID: PMC3636330          DOI: 10.1037/a0026336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  28 in total

1.  Timing for the absence of a stimulus: the gap paradigm reversed.

Authors:  C V Buhusi; W H Meck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-07

2.  Differential effects of methamphetamine and haloperidol on the control of an internal clock.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Timing light and tone signals in pigeons.

Authors:  W A Roberts; K Cheng; J S Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-01

6.  Isolation of an internal clock.

Authors:  S Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-07

7.  Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.

Authors:  W H Meck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Reinforcement-induced within-trial resetting of an internal clock.

Authors:  M S Matell; W H Meck
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.

Authors:  Daren H Kaiser; Thomas R Zentall; Emily Neiman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-10

10.  Modeling pharmacological clock and memory patterns of interval timing in a striatal beat-frequency model with realistic, noisy neurons.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Phase resetting and its implications for interval timing with intruders.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Steven Dix; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Sex differences in interval timing and attention to time in C57Bl/6J mice.

Authors:  Mona Buhusi; Mitchell J Bartlett; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effect of distracter preexposure on the reset of an internal clock.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Alexander R Matthews
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Blockade of Catecholamine Reuptake in the Prelimbic Cortex Decreases Top-down Attentional Control in Response to Novel, but Not Familiar Appetitive Distracters, within a Timing Paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander R Matthews; Mona Buhusi; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  NeuroSci       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  Dissociation of the role of the prelimbic cortex in interval timing and resource allocation: beneficial effect of norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor nomifensine on anxiety-inducing distraction.

Authors:  Alexander R Matthews; Olivia H He; Mona Buhusi; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.