| Literature DB >> 22121478 |
Matej Durik1, Richard van Veghel, Anneke Kuipers, Rick Rink, Marijke Haas Jimoh Akanbi, Gert Moll, A H Jan Danser, Anton J M Roks.
Abstract
Modulation of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) is an attractive approach to combat the detrimental consequences of myocardial infarction (MI). However Ang-(1-7) has limited clinical potential due to its unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile. We investigated effects of a stabilized, thioether-bridged analogue of Ang-(1-7) called cyclic Ang-(1-7) in rat model of myocardial infarction. Rats underwent coronary ligation or sham surgery. Two weeks thereafter infusion with 0.24 or 2.4 μg/kg/h cAng-(1-7) or saline was started for 8 weeks. Thereafter, cardiac morphometric and hemodynamic variables as wells as aortic endothelial function were measured. The average infarct size was 13.8% and was not changed by cAng-(1-7) treatment. MI increased heart weight and myocyte size, which was restored by cAng-(1-7) to sham levels. In addition, cAng-(1-7) lowered left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and improved endothelial function. The results suggest that cAng-(1-7) is a promising new agent in treatment of myocardial infarction and warrant further research.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22121478 PMCID: PMC3205684 DOI: 10.1155/2012/536426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hypertens Impact factor: 2.420
Weight, basic histological and cardiac parameters.
| Sham | MI | Sham | MI | MI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| saline | saline | high cAng-(1–7) | low cAng-(1–7) | high cAng-(1–7) | |
| BW, g | 477.1 ± 6.6 | 475.3 ± 6.4 | 484.6 ± 7.4 | 458.6 ± 10 | 492.3 ± 9.5 |
| Infarct size, % | 0 ± 0 | 15.853 ± 3.17 | 0 ± 0 | 9.721 ± 2.89 | 14.535 ± 4.10 |
| Fibrosis, % | 3.896 ± 0.57 | 3.992 ± 0.39 | 4.289 ± 0.54 | 4.695 ± 0.65 | 4.479 ± 0.34 |
| HR beats/min | 255.12 ± 16.0 | 260.3 ± 5.5 | 240.4 ± 9.8 | 274.7 ± 6.2 | 266.7 ± 6.2 |
| MaxP, mmHg | 107.8 ± 3.8 | 103.5 ± 2.9 | 98.6 ± 8.3 | 93.0 ± 4.7 | 96.4 ± 4.7 |
| ESPress, mmHg | 103.6 ± 4.2 | 100.1 ± 3.0 | 93.5 ± 9.3 | 89.4 ± 5.3 | 92.4 ± 5.1 |
| dpdtMax, mmHg/sec | 5572.0 ± 188.2 | 5456.8 ± 198.7 | 5533.0 ± 530.7 | 5026 ± 269.3 | 5111.3 ± 345.1 |
| dpdtMin, mmHg/sec | −5189.1 ± 178.8 | −4919.1 ± 265.2 | −6123.5 ± 1268.9 | −4615.4 ± 361.8 | −4742.6 ± 404.9 |
|
| 8 | 25 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
Figure 1Comparison of heart weight/body weight ratios between the different treatments (a), variables of cardiac hypertrophy: myocyte, cross-sectional area (b), and myocyte density (c). (*P < 0.05, One way ANOVA, Dunnett's post hoc testing).
Figure 2Effects of cAng 1–7 on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and minimal pressure in both sham-operated rats and rats with myocardial infarction. (# P < 0.05t-test sham saline versus sham cAng-(1–7); *P < 0.05, One way ANOVA for MI groups, Dunnett's post hoc testing; $ P < 0.05 for linear trend for MI groups).
Figure 3Endothelial-dependent dilator function of rat aorta to metacholine (a), after blockade of eNOS/NO signaling (b), and after combined blockade of eNOS/NO and EDHF vasodilator mechanisms (c). (*P < 0.05, GLM-RM).