Literature DB >> 22120855

Evaluation of eperisone hydrochloride in the treatment of acute musculoskeletal spasm associated with low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

A S Chandanwale1, A Chopra, A Goregaonkar, B Medhi, V Shah, S Gaikwad, D G Langade, S Maroli, S C Mehta, A Naikwadi, D R Pawar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eperisone hydrochloride is a centrally acting muscle relaxant inhibiting the pain reflex pathway, having a vasodilator effect. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of eperisone in patients with acute musculoskeletal spasm associated with low back pain. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric trial conducted at five tertiary care orthopedic centers across India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was planned to enroll 240 patients of either sex between 18-60 years with acute musculoskeletal spasm (AMSP) with low back pain (LBP) due to spondylosis deformans, prolapsed disc or muscle sprain. Patients with other associated unrelated spasm conditions were excluded. Assessments were done for finger-to-floor distance (FFD), lumbar pain, Lasegue's sign, tenderness of vertebral muscles, need for rescue medication and response to therapy for efficacy and tolerability. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Parametric data were analyzed by 't' test and ANOVA, and non-parametric data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney 'U' test and Kruskall-Wallis test. Proportions were compared using Fischer's (Chi-square) test.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty patients were randomized to receive eperisone 150 mg/day in three divided doses (n=120) or placebo (n=120) for 14 days, of which 15 patients did not complete and 225 patients completed the study (eperisone, 112 and placebo, 113). Significantly greater improvement in FFD (P<0.001) from baseline on Day 14 was seen with eperisone (150.66 to 41.75) compared to placebo (138.51 to 101.60). Improvements in other parameters were greater with the eperisone group. For 89 (79.46%) patients the therapy was rated as good-excellent with eperisone compared to 43 (38.05%) patients with placebo. Nausea, abdominal pain, headache and dizziness were the common adverse events with both therapies. Rescue drug was needed by 40 (35.71%) eperisone patients and 83 (73.45%) placebo patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Eperisone hydrochloride was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with AMSP with LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120855     DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.90076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Muscle Cramps in Patients With Cirrhosis of Liver: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shivam Kalia; Preetam Nath; Mona Pathak; Anil C Anand
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-02

2.  Effects of Eperisone Hydrochloride and Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Acute Non-Specific Back Pain with Muscle Spasm: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.

Authors:  Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon; Vincent Ongko Wijaya; Dessy Paramitha; Raymondus Rangga Bagaskara
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2020-11-16

Review 3.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  The Chinese Association for the Study of Pain (CASP): Consensus on the Assessment and Management of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Zhi-Gang Zhuang; Lin Wang; Xian-Guo Liu; Li-Juan Lu; Xiao-Qiu Yang; Yan Lu; Zhi-Jian Fu; Tao Song; Dong Huang; Hui Liu; You-Qing Huang; Bao-Gan Peng; Yan-Qing Liu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps by blockade of the medial branch of the deep peroneal nerve after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Takayuki Imura; Gen Inoue; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Kentaro Uchida; Takanori Namba; Eiki Shirasawa; Naonobu Takahira; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.