OBJECTIVE: Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare and indolent form of uterine cancer with ill-defined post-operative treatment guidelines. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of recurrence and the effect of various adjuvant treatment modalities. METHODS: Patients with ESS at 4 institutions were identified (1986-2007). Patient demographics, pathology, treatment, and follow-up information were collected. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with ESS were identified. All patients initially underwent hysterectomy. Twenty-eight (66.7%) had early stage, 12 (28.6%) had advanced stage ESS, and 2 (4.8%) had no staging information. Eight patients received pelvic and or vaginal cuff radiation treatment, with or without chemotherapy. Sixteen of 43 patients experienced a recurrence at an average of 100.5months. Thirty-three patients were treated with progestin therapy alone or followed expectantly. Complete outpatient records were available for 28 of these patients. Sixteen patients (57%) were followed expectantly while 12 (43%) received progestins. Patients receiving progestins vs. expectant management had a lower rate of recurrence in stage 1 (14.3% vs 38.5%, p=0.26) and all stages (33% vs 50%, p=0.38). Twenty-three of 28 (82.1%) patients underwent initial oophorectomy. Eight of 23 (34.8%) had a recurrence, compared to 4 of 5 (80%) in those who retained their ovaries (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ESS is a rare cancer that is difficult to study. We found removal of the adnexa and post-operative treatment with progestin therapy decreased recurrence rates. These two treatment strategies should be considered in the treatment of patients with all stages of ESS. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE:Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare and indolent form of uterine cancer with ill-defined post-operative treatment guidelines. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of recurrence and the effect of various adjuvant treatment modalities. METHODS:Patients with ESS at 4 institutions were identified (1986-2007). Patient demographics, pathology, treatment, and follow-up information were collected. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with ESS were identified. All patients initially underwent hysterectomy. Twenty-eight (66.7%) had early stage, 12 (28.6%) had advanced stage ESS, and 2 (4.8%) had no staging information. Eight patients received pelvic and or vaginal cuff radiation treatment, with or without chemotherapy. Sixteen of 43 patients experienced a recurrence at an average of 100.5months. Thirty-three patients were treated with progestin therapy alone or followed expectantly. Complete outpatient records were available for 28 of these patients. Sixteen patients (57%) were followed expectantly while 12 (43%) received progestins. Patients receiving progestins vs. expectant management had a lower rate of recurrence in stage 1 (14.3% vs 38.5%, p=0.26) and all stages (33% vs 50%, p=0.38). Twenty-three of 28 (82.1%) patients underwent initial oophorectomy. Eight of 23 (34.8%) had a recurrence, compared to 4 of 5 (80%) in those who retained their ovaries (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ESS is a rare cancer that is difficult to study. We found removal of the adnexa and post-operative treatment with progestin therapy decreased recurrence rates. These two treatment strategies should be considered in the treatment of patients with all stages of ESS. Copyright Â
Authors: Khalid El-Khalfaoui; Andreas du Bois; Florian Heitz; Christian Kurzeder; Jalid Sehouli; Philipp Harter Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: D Denschlag; F C Thiel; S Ackermann; P Harter; I Juhasz-Boess; P Mallmann; H-G Strauss; U Ulrich; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; D Vordermark; T Vogl; P Reichardt; P Gaß; M Gebhardt; M W Beckmann Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Ben Davidson; Vera Maria Abeler; Ellen Hellesylt; Arild Holth; Ie-Ming Shih; Tone Skeie-Jensen; Li Chen; Yanqin Yang; Tian-Li Wang Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 5.482