Literature DB >> 22119799

What if you are not sure? Electroencephalographic correlates of subjective confidence level about a decision.

A Selimbeyoglu1, Y Keskin-Ergen, T Demiralp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Action monitoring has been studied in terms of EEG correlates of accuracy/inaccuracy. EEG signals related to the confidence level (uncertainty) of the subject about given responses remain to be clarified.
METHODS: Two discrimination tasks that create difficulty in stimulus processing and response selection stages of decision making were used. Conditions were certain-hit (hit trials where subjects were certain), certain-error (trials where subject was aware of the error), uncertain (trials where subject was uncertain). Analyzes of event-related potentials (ERP) (ERN, Pe, P3) in the time domain were extended by time-frequency analysis of both phase-locked and non-phase-locked oscillatory activities.
RESULTS: Errors caused by difficulty in stimulus processing led more uncertainty than the ones related to the response selection, and tended to elicit ERN with shorter latency. Each condition was discriminated from the others by at least one parameter. Uncertainty was discriminated by total theta activity following response, total delta activity following stimulus and mean P3 amplitude.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective confidence levels of decision making can be discriminated by time and time-frequency analyses of ERPs and EEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Time-frequency parameters of EEG can be useful in the detection of subjective confidence in single-trials, which might be efficiently used for faster human-computer interaction.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119799     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  9 in total

1.  Measurement of cognitive dynamics during video watching through event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillations (EROs).

Authors:  Emel Erdogdu; Elif Kurt; Adil Deniz Duru; Atilla Uslu; Canan Başar-Eroğlu; Tamer Demiralp
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task.

Authors:  Elisa Porth; André Mattes; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.526

Review 3.  Is there any electrophysiological evidence for subliminal error processing?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Puzzle task ERP response: time-frequency and source localization analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Almurshedi; Abd Khamim Ismail
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.757

5.  Cyborg groups enhance face recognition in crowded environments.

Authors:  Davide Valeriani; Riccardo Poli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Caterina Cinel; Davide Valeriani; Riccardo Poli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Performance of healthy persons under pain in different cognitive load tasks: An event-related potential study on experimental pain individuals.

Authors:  Kangling Wang; Guiyuan Cai; Shimin Huang; Yuqi Li; Rongdong Li; Wen Wu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Brain activity and medical diagnosis: an EEG study.

Authors:  Laila Massad Ribas; Fábio Theoto Rocha; Neli Regina Siqueira Ortega; Armando Freitas da Rocha; Eduardo Massad
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Collaborative brain-computer interface for aiding decision-making.

Authors:  Riccardo Poli; Davide Valeriani; Caterina Cinel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.