Literature DB >> 22119619

Propofol, the preferred sedation for screening colonoscopy, is underused. Results of an international survey.

Andrea Riphaus1, Carlos Macias-Gomez, Jacques Devière, Jean-Marc Dumonceau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of propofol during colonoscopy has become more widespread. To increase availability while maintaining quality and decreasing costs, European Guidelines have been issued for non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP). We aimed to assess the current use of propofol during screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: International survey.
RESULTS: Eighty-four questionnaires were collected from endoscopists practicing in 29 countries. Practices were most often located in high-volume community hospitals (Italy, Belgium, Spain, Netherlands in half cases). An anesthesiologist was regularly present in the Endoscopy Unit of 69.0% survey respondents. In low-risk (ASA classification, 1-2) patients, propofol, benzodiazepine+opioids and benzodiazepine alone were used in 45%, 31% and 14% of screening colonoscopies, respectively. Propofol was associated with the highest endoscopist satisfaction (score on a 10-point visual analogue scale, 9.2±1.2 vs. 5.5±1.9 and 4.7±2.0 for benzodiazepine+opioids and benzodiazepine alone, respectively; P<0.0001). NAAP was used by 29.9% of respondents in 9 countries and approximately two-thirds of other endoscopists would consider implementing NAAP. Main reasons for not considering NAAP implementation were medico-legal issues and cost.
CONCLUSION: Propofol provides the highest endoscopist satisfaction but it is used in less than half of screening colonoscopies. Propofol is administered by non-anesthesiologists in one-third of settings; its implementation is foreseen by a majority of endoscopists who do not currently use it.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119619     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  12 in total

1.  Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol versus midazolam and propofol, titrated to moderate sedation, for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Javier Molina-Infante; Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil; Jose M Mateos-Rodriguez; Belen Perez-Gallardo; Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez; Moises Hernandez-Alonso; Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo; Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Sedation in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-05

3.  Unsedated versus sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: a questionnaire investigation in Wuhan, central China.

Authors:  Hong-Ling Wang; Fen Ye; Wen-Fei Liao; Bing Xia; Guo-Rong Zheng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 4.  Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014?

Authors:  Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira; Marília Cravo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of remimazolam for sedation.

Authors:  Nazir Noor; Rhorer Legendre; Alexandra Cloutet; Ahish Chitneni; Giustino Varrassi; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 6.  Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.

Authors:  John K Triantafillidis; Emmanuel Merikas; Dimitrios Nikolakis; Apostolos E Papalois
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Propofol alternatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia.

Authors:  Basavana Gouda Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

8.  NAPS in 2016: why not everywhere?

Authors:  Andrea Riphaus
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-03

Review 9.  Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-10-23

10.  Results from the Adverse Event Sedation Reporting Tool: A Global Anthology of 7952 Records Derived from >160,000 Procedural Sedation Encounters.

Authors:  Keira P Mason; Mark G Roback; David Chrisp; Nicole Sturzenbaum; Lee Freeman; David Gozal; Firoz Vellani; David Cavanaugh; Steven M Green
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.