Literature DB >> 22119617

Safety and outcome of chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer: results from two French tertiary centres.

David Tougeron1, Bernard Roullet, Bernard Paillot, Hadji Hamidou, Jean-Marc Tourani, Réné-Jean Bensadoun, Pierre Michel, Christine Silvain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risks of chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer have not yet been well-characterised.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with rectal cancer over 70 years old who were treated with chemoradiotherapy in two French university hospitals.
RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were evaluated. Mean age was 75.1 ± 4.1 years and ranged from 70 to 90 years. Adverse effects ≥ grade 2 were observed in 32% of the patients and adverse effects ≥ grade 3 in 15%. Dose reduction for toxicity was performed in 18% of the patients and chemoradiotherapy discontinuation was necessary in 9%. Postoperative morbidity was 16% with two treatment-related deaths. Two-year survival rate was 84%. No variables had any influence on treatment-related adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected elderly patients, chemoradiotherapy is well-tolerated, without any significant increase in adverse events, and the results are similar to those recorded in younger patients. Copyright Â
© 2011 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119617     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  9 in total

Review 1.  Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Treatment Approach in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Francesca De Felice; Daniele Crocetti; Veronica Maiuri; Martina Parisi; Francesco Marampon; Luciano Izzo; Giorgio De Toma; Daniela Musio; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11

2.  Toxicities and outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Ruba Ahmed Hamed; Greg Korpanty; Dervla Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ayesha R Sheikh; Hassan Yameen; Kevan Hartshorn
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: Acute Toxicity, Compliance with Treatment, and Early Results.

Authors:  Valentine Guimas; Jihane Boustani; Benjamin Schipman; Nicolas Lescut; Marc Puyraveau; Jean François Bosset; Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesca De Felice; Daniela Musio; Luciano Izzo; Federico Pugliese; Paolo Izzo; Antonio Bolognese; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Implications for determining the optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer in elderly patients aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  Jue-feng Wan; Ji Zhu; Gui-chao Li; Wen-jie Sun; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-06

8.  Tolerability and outcomes of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in elderly patients aged 70 years and older.

Authors:  Xin Cai; Hongbin Wu; Junjie Peng; Ji Zhu; Sanjun Cai; Gang Cai; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Patterns of Pelvic Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy L Fitzgerald; Emmanuel Zervos; Jan H Wong
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.