BACKGROUND: The effect of comorbidity, age and performance status (PS) on treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is poorly understood. We examined these factors as predictors of outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated withgemcitabine +/- erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comorbidity was evaluated by two physicians using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and correlated with clinical outcome data from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) PA.3 clinical trial. RESULTS:Five hundred and sixty-nine patients were included; 47% were aged ≥ 65 years old, 36% had comorbidity (CCI>0). In multivariate analysis, neither age (p=0.22) nor comorbidity (p=0.21) was associated with overall survival. The baseline presence of better PS and lower pain intensity scores was associated with better overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p=0.01, respectively). An improvement in survival with the addition of erlotinib therapy was seen in patients age < 65 (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, p=0.01) or in the presence of comorbidity (adjusted HR 0.72, p=0.03). However, neither age nor CCI score was predictive of erlotinib benefit after test for interaction. Patients treated with gemcitabine plus erlotinibwho were ≥ 65 years of age or those with comorbidity had a higher rate of infections ≥ grade 3. CONCLUSION:Low baseline pain intensity and better PS were associated with improved overall survival, while age and comorbidity were not independent prognostic factors for patients treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The effect of comorbidity, age and performance status (PS) on treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is poorly understood. We examined these factors as predictors of outcome in advanced pancreatic cancerpatients treated with gemcitabine +/- erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comorbidity was evaluated by two physicians using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and correlated with clinical outcome data from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) PA.3 clinical trial. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-nine patients were included; 47% were aged ≥ 65 years old, 36% had comorbidity (CCI>0). In multivariate analysis, neither age (p=0.22) nor comorbidity (p=0.21) was associated with overall survival. The baseline presence of better PS and lower pain intensity scores was associated with better overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p=0.01, respectively). An improvement in survival with the addition of erlotinib therapy was seen in patients age < 65 (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, p=0.01) or in the presence of comorbidity (adjusted HR 0.72, p=0.03). However, neither age nor CCI score was predictive of erlotinib benefit after test for interaction. Patients treated with gemcitabine plus erlotinib who were ≥ 65 years of age or those with comorbidity had a higher rate of infections ≥ grade 3. CONCLUSION: Low baseline pain intensity and better PS were associated with improved overall survival, while age and comorbidity were not independent prognostic factors for patients treated with gemcitabine-based therapy.
Authors: Sophie Cai; Theodore S Hong; Saveli I Goldberg; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Sarah P Thayer; Cristina R Ferrone; David P Ryan; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Eunice L Kwak; Christopher G Willett; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw; Jennifer Y Wo Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Donghui Li; Yixiang Mao; Ping Chang; Chang Liu; Manal M Hassan; Saiching J Yeung; James L Abbruzzese Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Emil Ter Veer; L Bengt van Rijssen; Marc G Besselink; Rosa M A Mali; Jordan D Berlin; Stefan Boeck; Franck Bonnetain; Ian Chau; Thierry Conroy; Eric Van Cutsem; Gael Deplanque; Helmut Friess; Bengt Glimelius; David Goldstein; Richard Herrmann; Roberto Labianca; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Teresa Macarulla; Jonathan H M van der Meer; John P Neoptolemos; Takuji Okusaka; Eileen M O'Reilly; Uwe Pelzer; Philip A Philip; Marcel J van der Poel; Michele Reni; Werner Scheithauer; Jens T Siveke; Chris Verslype; Olivier R Busch; Johanna W Wilmink; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: C P Escalante; Y C Chang; K Liao; T Rouleau; J Halm; P Bossi; S Bhadriraju; N Brito-Dellan; S Sahai; S W Yusuf; A Zalpour; L S Elting Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kazim Husain; Barbara A Centeno; Dung-Tsa Chen; Sunil R Hingorani; Said M Sebti; Mokenge P Malafa Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-08-20