Literature DB >> 22119014

The use of weekly departmental review of all orthopaedic intra-operative radiographs in order to improve quality, due to standardized peer expectations and the "Hawthorne effect".

Muiris T Kennedy1, Joshua C Y Ong, Aniruddha Mitra, James A Harty, Declan Reidy, Mark Dolan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinical governance highlights risk management, clinical effectiveness and use of evidence based practice as key elements in the provision of a quality service. A change in the method of quality control in our orthopaedic trauma unit allowed us the opportunity to study if the quality of operative outcomes had changed as a result. The Hawthorne effect refers to phenomenon whereby employees work quality improves by virtue of their awareness that their labour is being assessed.
METHODS: A new outcome appraisal forum was introduced in our department in 2009. This forum involved a weekly whole department review of all the previous week's intraoperative radiographs. We used the tip apex distance (TAD) of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) procedures in hip fracture patients as a surrogate marker, of any objective change in the quality and consistency of intra-operative radiographs, in the year prior to and after the introduction of this review system.
RESULTS: We found that the mean TAD and the number of TAD measurements over 25 mm decreased significantly in the year after the new quality control mechanism was introduced.
CONCLUSION: We would recommend the use of a weekly quality control meeting scrutinizing every intraoperative radiograph as a simple, cost effective method of incorporating many aspects of clinical governance, as well as fostering a culture of quality.
Copyright © 2011 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119014     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?

Authors:  Iain Willits; Julie Burn; Helen Cole; Tim Hoare; Andrew Sims
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.