J A Grinsdale1, C S Ho, H Banouvong, L M Kawamura. 1. Tuberculosis Control Section, Department of Public Health, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Ward 94 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Jennifer.Grinsdale@sfdph.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the proportion of contacts tested with QuantiFERON ® -TB Gold (QFT-G) compared to the tuberculin skin test (TST) who were successfully evaluated and treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and to assess the correlation of positive test results with measures of TB exposure. METHODS: Contacts of culture-confirmed pulmonary TB cases reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health between 1 March 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included. RESULTS: Of 1291 contacts meeting the eligibility criteria, 641 (50%) were tested with QFT-G and 650 (50%) with TST. Contacts tested with QFT-G were more likely to complete evaluation (64% vs. 56%, OR(adj ) = 1.52, 95%CI 1.12-2.06). Infected contacts started (89% vs. 72%, OR(adj) = 5.18, 95%CI 2.10-14.18) and completed (70% vs. 53%, OR(adj) = 3.37, 95%CI 1.78-6.56) LTBI treatment more often in the group tested with QFT-G. Positive QFT-G results, but not positive TST results, correlated with the intensity, proximity and duration of TB exposure in foreign-born subjects. CONCLUSION: More contacts were successfully evaluated and treated for LTBI when screened with QFT-G compared to TST. Measures of exposure correlated better with QFT-G-positive results and, therefore, appropriately identified high-risk contacts for TB prevention.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the proportion of contacts tested with QuantiFERON ® -TB Gold (QFT-G) compared to the tuberculin skin test (TST) who were successfully evaluated and treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and to assess the correlation of positive test results with measures of TB exposure. METHODS: Contacts of culture-confirmed pulmonary TB cases reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health between 1 March 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included. RESULTS: Of 1291 contacts meeting the eligibility criteria, 641 (50%) were tested with QFT-G and 650 (50%) with TST. Contacts tested with QFT-G were more likely to complete evaluation (64% vs. 56%, OR(adj ) = 1.52, 95%CI 1.12-2.06). Infected contacts started (89% vs. 72%, OR(adj) = 5.18, 95%CI 2.10-14.18) and completed (70% vs. 53%, OR(adj) = 3.37, 95%CI 1.78-6.56) LTBI treatment more often in the group tested with QFT-G. Positive QFT-G results, but not positive TST results, correlated with the intensity, proximity and duration of TB exposure in foreign-born subjects. CONCLUSION: More contacts were successfully evaluated and treated for LTBI when screened with QFT-G compared to TST. Measures of exposure correlated better with QFT-G-positive results and, therefore, appropriately identified high-risk contacts for TB prevention.
Authors: Jason E Stout; Shereen Katrak; Neela D Goswami; Brianna L Norton; Ellen R Fortenberry; Evelyn Foust; Peter A Leone Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Betty A Forbes; Geraldine S Hall; Melissa B Miller; Susan M Novak; Marie-Claire Rowlinson; Max Salfinger; Akos Somoskövi; David M Warshauer; Michael L Wilson Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Christiaan Mulder; Henk van Deutekom; Erik M Huisman; Sophie Toumanian; Ben F P J Koster; Wieneke Meijer-Veldman; Joke H van Loenhout-Rooyackers; Milo Appel; Sandra M Arend; Martien W Borgdorff; Frank van Leth Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Andrea Parriott; Mohsen Malekinejad; Amanda P Miller; Hacsi Horvath; Suzanne M Marks; James G Kahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maunank Shah; Danielle DiPietro; Adena Greenbaum; Sherry Ketemepi; Maria Martins-Evora; Vincent Marsiglia; Susan E Dorman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andreas Sandgren; Marije Vonk Noordegraaf-Schouten; Femke van Kessel; Anke Stuurman; Anouk Oordt-Speets; Marieke J van der Werf Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.090