Literature DB >> 22118100

Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection.

Y de Haas1, J J Windig, M P L Calus, J Dijkstra, M de Haan, A Bannink, R F Veerkamp.   

Abstract

Mitigation of enteric methane (CH₄) emission in ruminants has become an important area of research because accumulation of CH₄ is linked to global warming. Nutritional and microbial opportunities to reduce CH₄ emissions have been extensively researched, but little is known about using natural variation to breed animals with lower CH₄ yield. Measuring CH₄ emission rates directly from animals is difficult and hinders direct selection on reduced CH₄ emission. However, improvements can be made through selection on associated traits (e.g., residual feed intake, RFI) or through selection on CH₄ predicted from feed intake and diet composition. The objective was to establish phenotypic and genetic variation in predicted CH₄ output, and to determine the potential of genetics to reduce methane emissions in dairy cattle. Experimental data were used and records on daily feed intake, weekly body weights, and weekly milk production were available from 548 heifers. Residual feed intake (MJ/d) is the difference between net energy intake and calculated net energy requirements for maintenance as a function of body weight and for fat- and protein-corrected milk production. Predicted methane emission (PME; g/d) is 6% of gross energy intake (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodology) corrected for energy content of methane (55.65 kJ/g). The estimated heritabilities for PME and RFI were 0.35 and 0.40, respectively. The positive genetic correlation between RFI and PME indicated that cows with lower RFI have lower PME (estimates ranging from 0.18 to 0.84). Hence, it is possible to decrease the methane production of a cow by selecting more-efficient cows, and the genetic variation suggests that reductions in the order of 11 to 26% in 10 yr are theoretically possible, and could be even higher in a genomic selection program. However, several uncertainties are discussed; for example, the lack of true methane measurements (and the key assumption that methane produced per unit feed is not affected by RFI level), as well as the limitations of predicting the biological consequences of selection. To overcome these limitations, an international effort is required to bring together data on feed intake and methane emissions of dairy cows.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22118100     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  22 in total

Review 1.  The eco-evolutionary impacts of domestication and agricultural practices on wild species.

Authors:  Martin M Turcotte; Hitoshi Araki; Daniel S Karp; Katja Poveda; Susan R Whitehead
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Drosophila cytokine unpaired 2 regulates physiological homeostasis by remotely controlling insulin secretion.

Authors:  Akhila Rajan; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Heritability of methane emissions from dairy cows over a lactation measured on commercial farms.

Authors:  M Pszczola; K Rzewuska; S Mucha; T Strabel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Estimates of the genetic contribution to methane emission in dairy cows: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants.

Authors:  N K Pickering; V H Oddy; J Basarab; K Cammack; B Hayes; R S Hegarty; J Lassen; J C McEwan; S Miller; C S Pinares-Patiño; Y de Haas
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits.

Authors:  C Egger-Danner; J B Cole; J E Pryce; N Gengler; B Heringstad; A Bradley; K F Stock
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  In-vitro fermentation characteristics and methane reduction potential of mustard cake (Brassica juncea L.).

Authors:  S M Durge; M K Tripathi; N Dutta
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-10-26

8.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.

Authors:  J A Basarab; K A Beauchemin; V S Baron; K H Ominski; L L Guan; S P Miller; J J Crowley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modelling the Effect of Diet Composition on Enteric Methane Emissions across Sheep, Beef Cattle and Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Matt Bell; Richard Eckard; Peter J Moate; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Archaeal abundance in post-mortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle.

Authors:  R John Wallace; John A Rooke; Carol-Anne Duthie; Jimmy J Hyslop; David W Ross; Nest McKain; Shirley Motta de Souza; Timothy J Snelling; Anthony Waterhouse; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.