Literature DB >> 22118093

Prediction of enteric methane output from milk fatty acid concentrations and rumen fermentation parameters in dairy cows fed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds.

R Mohammed1, S M McGinn, K A Beauchemin.   

Abstract

Milk fatty acid (FA) composition has been suggested as a means of predicting enteric methane (CH₄) output in lactating dairy cattle because of the common biochemical pathways among CH₄, acetate, and butyrate in the rumen. Sixteen lactating Holstein cows were used in a Latin square design with four 28-d periods. All diets contained steam-rolled barley, a pelleted supplement, barley silage [45% of dietary dry matter (DM)] and 3.3% added fat (DM basis) from 1 of 4 sources: calcium salts of long-chain FA (palm oil; control) or crushed oilseeds from sunflower, flax, or canola. The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the effect of diets on milk FA profile; (2) model CH₄ production from milk FA composition, intake, and rumen fermentation variables; and (3) test the applicability of CH(4) prediction equations reported in previous studies. Methane (g/d) was measured in chambers (2 animals/chamber) on 3 consecutive days (d 21-23). The test variables included total DM intake (DMI, kg/d; d 21-23), forage DMI (kg/d; d 21-23), milk yield (kg/d; d 21-23), milk components (d 18-21), milk FA composition (% total FA methyl esters; d 18-21), rumen volatile FA (mol/100 mol; d 19-21), and protozoal counts (d 19-21), and were averaged by chamber and period to determine relationships between CH₄ and the test variables. Milk trans(t)10-, t11-18:1, and cis(c)9t11-18:2 were greater for sunflower seeds compared with the other diets. Forage DMI (correlation coefficient, r=0.52; n=32), DMI (r=0.52; n=32), and rumen acetate + butyrate:propionate (r=0.72; n=16) were positively related to CH₄ (g/d), whereas rumen propionate (r=0.63; n=16), milk c9-17:1 (r=0.64; n=32), and c11-18:1 (r=0.64; n=32) were negatively related to CH₄. The best regression equation (coefficient of determination=0.90; n=16) was CH₄ (g/d)=-910.8 (±156.7) × milk c9-17:1 + 331.2 (±88.8) × milk 16:0 iso + 0.0001 (±0.00) × total entodiniomorphs + 242.5 (±39.7). Removing rumen parameters from the model also resulted in a reasonably good estimate (coefficient of determination=0.83; n=32) of CH₄. Stepwise regression analysis within diets resulted in greater coefficient of determination and lower standard error values. Predictions of CH₄, using equations from previous studies for the data set from this study, resulted in a mean overestimation ranging from 19 to 61% across studies. Thus, milk FA alone may not be suitable for developing universal CH₄ prediction equations.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22118093     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

1.  Estimates of the genetic contribution to methane emission in dairy cows: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Pelleting in Associated with Sodium Monensin Increases the Conjugated Linoleic Acids Concentration in the Milk of Dairy Cows Fed Canola Seeds.

Authors:  Francilaine Eloise De Marchi; Jakeline Vieira Romero; Julio Cesar Damasceno; Paula Adriana Grande; Lúcia Maria Zeoula; Geraldo Tadeu Dos Santos
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Influence of Sunflower Whole Seeds or Oil on Ruminal Fermentation, Milk Production, Composition, and Fatty Acid Profile in Lactating Goats.

Authors:  T A Morsy; S M Kholif; A E Kholif; O H Matloup; A Z M Salem; A Abu Elella
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits.

Authors:  C Egger-Danner; J B Cole; J E Pryce; N Gengler; B Heringstad; A Bradley; K F Stock
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Body fat mobilization in early lactation influences methane production of dairy cows.

Authors:  A Bielak; M Derno; A Tuchscherer; H M Hammon; A Susenbeth; B Kuhla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Linseed Oil Supplementation of Lambs' Diet in Early Life Leads to Persistent Changes in Rumen Microbiome Structure.

Authors:  Tamsin Lyons; Tommy Boland; Sean Storey; Evelyn Doyle
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Genome-wide association identifies methane production level relation to genetic control of digestive tract development in dairy cows.

Authors:  M Pszczola; T Strabel; S Mucha; E Sell-Kubiak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genome-Wide Association Studies for Methane Production in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  R Calderón-Chagoya; J H H Hernandez-Medrano; F J J Ruiz-López; A Garcia-Ruiz; V E E Vega-Murillo; M Montano-Bermudez; M E E Arechavaleta-Velasco; E Gonzalez-Padilla; E I I Mejia-Melchor; N Saunders; J A A Bonilla-Cardenas; P C C Garnsworthy; S I I Román-Ponce
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Enteric Methane Emissions of Dairy Cows Predicted from Fatty Acid Profiles of Milk, Cream, Cheese, Ricotta, Whey, and Scotta.

Authors:  Giovanni Bittante; Matteo Bergamaschi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Volatile Fatty Acids in Ruminal Fluid Can Be Used to Predict Methane Yield of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  S Richard O Williams; Murray C Hannah; Joe L Jacobs; William J Wales; Peter J Moate
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.