Literature DB >> 22117901

Utility-aware screening with clique-oriented prioritization.

S Joshua Swamidass1, Bradley T Calhoun, Joshua A Bittker, Nicole E Bodycombe, Paul A Clemons.   

Abstract

Most methods of deciding which hits from a screen to send for confirmatory testing assume that all confirmed actives are equally valuable and aim only to maximize the number of confirmed hits. In contrast, "utility-aware" methods are informed by models of screeners' preferences and can increase the rate at which the useful information is discovered. Clique-oriented prioritization (COP) extends a recently proposed economic framework and aims--by changing which hits are sent for confirmatory testing--to maximize the number of scaffolds with at least two confirmed active examples. In both retrospective and prospective experiments, COP enables accurate predictions of the number of clique discoveries in a batch of confirmatory experiments and improves the rate of clique discovery by more than 3-fold. In contrast, other similarity-based methods like ontology-based pattern identification (OPI) and local hit-rate analysis (LHR) reduce the rate of scaffold discovery by about half. The utility-aware algorithm used to implement COP is general enough to implement several other important models of screener preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22117901      PMCID: PMC3264765          DOI: 10.1021/ci2003285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of the consistency of medicinal chemists in reviewing sets of compounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lajiness; Gerald M Maggiora; Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Design and analysis of experiments with high throughput biological assay data.

Authors:  David M Rocke
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Enrichment of high-throughput screening data with increasing levels of noise using support vector machines, recursive partitioning, and laplacian-modified naive bayesian classifiers.

Authors:  Meir Glick; Jeremy L Jenkins; James H Nettles; Hamilton Hitchings; John W Davies
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Vladimir Makarenkov; Pablo Zentilli; Dmytro Kevorkov; Andrei Gagarin; Nathalie Malo; Robert Nadon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Enhanced HTS hit selection via a local hit rate analysis.

Authors:  Bruce A Posner; Hualin Xi; James E J Mills
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Enhancing the rate of scaffold discovery with diversity-oriented prioritization.

Authors:  S Joshua Swamidass; Bradley T Calhoun; Joshua A Bittker; Nicole E Bodycombe; Paul A Clemons
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Maximum-score diversity selection for early drug discovery.

Authors:  Thorsten Meinl; Claude Ostermann; Michael R Berthold
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Distinct biological network properties between the targets of natural products and disease genes.

Authors:  Vlado Dancík; Kathleen Petri Seiler; Damian W Young; Stuart L Schreiber; Paul A Clemons
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  ChemBank: a small-molecule screening and cheminformatics resource database.

Authors:  Kathleen Petri Seiler; Gregory A George; Mary Pat Happ; Nicole E Bodycombe; Hyman A Carrinski; Stephanie Norton; Steve Brudz; John P Sullivan; Jeremy Muhlich; Martin Serrano; Paul Ferraiolo; Nicola J Tolliday; Stuart L Schreiber; Paul A Clemons
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  An informatic pipeline for managing high-throughput screening experiments and analyzing data from stereochemically diverse libraries.

Authors:  Carol A Mulrooney; David L Lahr; Michael J Quintin; Willmen Youngsaye; Dennis Moccia; Jacob K Asiedu; Evan L Mulligan; Lakshmi B Akella; Lisa A Marcaurelle; Philip Montgomery; Joshua A Bittker; Paul A Clemons; Stephen Brudz; Sivaraman Dandapani; Jeremy R Duvall; Nicola J Tolliday; Andrea De Souza
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Bigger data, collaborative tools and the future of predictive drug discovery.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Alex M Clark; S Joshua Swamidass; Nadia Litterman; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.